Protesters take part in a demonstration against Syria's President Bashar Al Assad, and to protest against the killing of at least 108 people in the Syrian town of Al Houla last Friday, in Cairo May 31, 2012. Image Credit: REUTERS

Beirut The swaggering gunmen operate as hired muscle for the Syrian regime, clutching rifles and daggers as they sweep through towns and villages, sometimes after regular military troops have pulled back.

Recruited from the ruling elite’s Alawite sect, the pro-regime militiamen known as ‘‘Shabiha” are believed to be carrying out some of the most ghastly attacks of the Syrian uprising, allowing President Bashar Assad’s government to deny direct responsibility for the crimes.

The UN says there are strong suspicions that pro-Al Assad fighters were responsible for at least some of the carnage during a weekend massacre in Houla, bringing fresh attention to the shadowy fighters who appear to be taking on a bigger role in Syria’s bloody conflict.

More than 100 people were killed in the massacre, many of them women and children who were gunned down in their homes. Damascus has unequivocally denied any role, blaming the slaughter on terrorists — the same term it uses for rebel forces in the country.

Many Syrians say the Shabiha are more terrifying than the army and security forces, whose tactics include shelling residential neighbourhoods and firing on protesters. The gunmen, they say, are deployed specifically to brutalise and intimidate Al Assad’s opponents.

The origin of the word Shabiha is murky, although some have speculated it comes from “Shabah,” the Arabic word for “ghost.” Others say it signifies someone with a “long reach.”

In a recent report on the Shabiha, Syrian writer Yassin Al Haj Salih described the fighters as “spare muscle clutching a gun.” Their privileges, he said, include “immunity, promotion, preferences at schools and universities, not to mention direct wages, such as the booty acquired in fighting the current revolution.”

Even if the Shabiha are responsible for Houla, however, there is no clear evidence that the regime ordered the massacre. There is no obvious chain of command from the regime to the Shabiha, and it is difficult to assign blame for much of the country’s bloodshed because the violence has become so widespread and chaotic.

Besides the government-sanctioned violence, rebel fighters are launching increasingly deadly attacks on regime targets, and several massive suicide attacks this year suggest Al Qaida or other extremists are joining the fray. Syria severely restricts the media in the country, making it difficult to gain a credible account of events on the ground.

Still, Shabiha gunmen have a long history in Syria, dating back to Al Assad’s father and predecessor, Hafez, who ruled Syria from 1971 until his death in 2000.

Under Hafez Assad, Shabiha gangs were armed through the military units commanded by Hafez’s brother, Rifaat, and their criminal exploits included racketeering, theft, blackmail and armed robbery. They also operated extensive smuggling rings, ferrying weapons, drugs, electronics and cigarettes to neighboring states.

Mousab Alhamadee, an activist based in the central province of Hama, said the Shabiha appear to be operating increasingly as rogue elements, without direct orders from on high.

“The Shabiha are more and more out of government control,” he said, and said the Houla massacre appeared to be a case in point.

“This massacre embarrassed the regime a lot,” he said. “The regime tries to avoid such crimes because of pressures from the international community and Russia.”

Still, the links with the regime remain strong. Alhamadee said he notices Shabiha in areas that are newly taken over by government troops.

“They move behind the troops, and their jobs is to rob and loot,” he said.