Islamabad: The party of Pakistan’s famed cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan, who has led a week of anti-government protests in the capital, resigned from parliament on Friday in its latest bid to drive Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif from power over alleged election fraud.
The move came a day after parliament presented a united front against Khan, with opposition parties backing a resolution rejecting his calls for Sharif’s resignation as unconstitutional despite the presence of thousands of protesters just outside.
In recent days, Khan issued a series of ultimatums calling on Sharif to step down, and at times it seemed his protesters might besiege parliament or enter the premier’s nearby office.
But on Friday he appeared to have backed down.
“We resigned from the National Assembly as we believe that the elections were not transparent,” Arif Alvi, a lawmaker from Khan’s party, told reporters.
Sadiqul Farooq, a spokesman for the ruling party, said there was no threat to the government, which retains the support of a 190-member majority.
Meanwhile, the party of Pakistani opposition politician Imran Khan said on Friday it was resuming talks with the government aimed at ending tense protests demanding the ousting of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.
Former cricketer Khan and populist cleric Tahir-ul-Qadri have led thousands of supporters demonstrating outside parliament this week calling for Sharif to go.
Khan insists the May 2013 general election, which swept Sharif to power in a landslide, was rigged, though observers rated it free and credible.
Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N) party insist he will not quit and accuse the protesters of undermining the country’s fragile democracy.
The standoff has raised fears of possible military intervention — the country has seen three coups since its creation in 1947 — though analysts say the army is more likely to use the crisis to assert influence behind the scenes than stage an outright power grab.
Talks to resolve the impasse that began on Wednesday stalled almost immediately, with Khan sticking to his hardline stance that Sharif must go before he would negotiate.
But his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) party on Friday said dialogue was restarting through contact with the governor of Punjab, Pakistan’s most populous province.
“We are resuming talks with the government,” Shah Mehmood Qureshi, PTI vice-chairman, said.
Ready for dialogue
Senior members of Qadri’s team have said they are ready for “meaningful dialogue” to end their protest, though little concrete progress appears to have been made since initial contact began on Wednesday.
The two protest movements are not formally allied and have different goals, beyond toppling the government. But their combined pressure — and numbers — have given extra heft to the rallies.
If one group were to reach a settlement with the government and withdraw, the other’s position would be significantly weakened.
Neither movement has mobilised mass support beyond their core followers and opposition parties have shunned Khan’s call to unseat the government and begin a campaign of civil disobedience.
Maulana Fazalur Rahman, chief of the religious Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) party, said the protests had no support from the majority of Pakistan’s 180 million population.
“They have been isolated and people of Pakistan have rejected them — there are maximum 5,000 to 6,000 people combined with them at night,” he told AFP.
Despite rumours that the military had some hand in the protests, the Minister for Water and Power Abid Sher Ali, a PML-N stalwart, insisted there was “no pressure on us from any state institution to resign.”
“It is the imagination of some lawless and outside elements camping out there,” he told AFP.
But if a full-blown coup d’etat looks unlikely — such a move could jeopardise billions of dollars in foreign assistance and trade deals — analysts say the crisis will leave Sharif weakened.
“The protests rocking Islamabad threaten to upend the constitutional order, set back rule of law and open the possibility of a soft coup, with the military ruling through the backdoor,” the International Crisis Group wrote.
Sharif has a history of testy relations with the military — his second term as prime minister ended abruptly in 1999 when then-army chief Pervez Musharraf seized power in a coup.
His government is thought to have angered the military by pursuing criminal cases against Musharraf dating back to his 1999-2008 rule, including treason charges.
The PM has also pursued better relations with arch-rivals India, whose perceived military threat is an important justification for the Pakistani army’s large budget allocation.
Retired general Talat Masood, a defence and political analyst, said the ultimate outcome was likely to be “real power then will further going to the hands of the military”.
