A documentary about men who became war photographers on the streets of their own towns
A photograph is worth a thousand words. But for the generation of newspaper photographers who captured history unfolding day by day through their lenses across three decades of political and sectarian strife in Northern Ireland, they are only now being able to put the body of their work into focus.
Thomas Kelly, a Dublin-based photo editor, is the producer of a moving new documentary, Shooting the Darkeness, on the work of Northern Ireland’s news photographers who were suddenly cast from covering small-town events such as cheque presentation and flower shows, to the bloody and brutal troubles that were ripping their communities apart.
“There are a lot of stand-out photographs from the troubles, iconic even,” Kelly tells Weekend Review about Shooting the Darkness which is directed by Tom Burke. “But those images don’t exist in a vacuum, stripped of context and aestheticised, separate to the photographers who took them. They’re part of their lives. Their experience is what makes the images almost living, breathing artefacts of that era.”
Shooting the Darkness was aired on German and French television in March, and is being entered into a series of film festivals in documentary categories.
Both Kelly and Burke had been tossing around the idea of a documentary on the life of a photojournalist, but a chance conversation quickly turned their germ of an idea into the work that took three years to complete.
“One photograph Hugh Russell will never forget taking is of a young Catholic who was killed by loyalist terrorists in 1992 outside his house,” Kelly says. “Russell went to take the photo, finding a gap between two parked RUC trucks to see the body lying covered with a sheet. A lady came out of the house, started to pray over him and he took that picture. And that wasn’t a high-profile death, it wasn’t at that stage. The Troubles had been going for so long, generally only multiple fatalities made the press. But it really resonated with Hugh and it was one of the first things he told us about.”
It’s also rare to hear a photographer describe a picture that he didn’t capture.
But that’s just what happened to Alan Lewis, recalling a Belfast bombing in 1971 at the Balmoral Furniture Company. Lewis was an eager but respectful press photographer, positioning himself beside an ambulance and away from the rescue efforts. He watched through his viewfinder as the body of an infant, dead and exposed, was carried out from the wreckage.
“And I just froze,” he remembers. “I couldn’t take the picture.”
His immediate reaction, however, was self-recrimination, resolving never to shy from an image again. Soon after, another child killed by the blast was brought out, this time wrapped in a blanket. “And I got a picture.”
Rather than being a strictly news or history documentary, this looks more at the craft of taking photos — and doing it in a warzone. “It’s about the guys who did this stuff. It’s about how they learned their craft; what’s a good photograph, the impact of a photograph,” Kelly says, adding that the craft of the work has changed with the advent of digital photography.
Back then, lensmen had limited film and had to make every shot count, while skills in the darkroom brought images to life slowly. “A photographer was never fully being sure what was on the roll of film until it was revealed in the darkroom process,” Kelly says.
Mick O’Reilly is the Gulf News Foreign Correspondent based in Europe.
They then left the body on the ground and and Bishop Daly gave him the last rites. And the one thing after it all starting to unroll and people had realised what had happened, the silence was the thing that you could have heard a pin drop. People were numbed and shocked, with bodies, with white cloth hanging over them.
There’s even a picture I had of a medic holding his head and looking down, in disbelief. The fact that there’s a priest, and two people carrying a dead youth, and he’s waving the handkerchief, blood-stained handkerchief, that blood-stained handkerchief was what you would call the punctum.
It’s that aspect of a photograph where it draws you back, you look at it once and then you move back and you go back again and there’s something that draws you into it, within that photograph there’s something and that’s the handkerchief and that’s what makes it such a powerful image.
It happened basically beside me, where the soldiers were apprehended. There was a fight for the weapon, they lost that fight and they were apprehended. It became evident that if I wanted to get this story out, what was in the camera had to be taken out and hidden. New film, put into the camera, wound on, you know, reeled up, so that, if I was asked for the film, I would open the camera and rip it out and it would look like it was being destroyed. And it worked, insofar as the story got out and the images got out. It’s probably better, to view the world when you’re in a situation like that, from behind the camera. Your mental process is going through composition, when to make that decision to press the shutter.
Staying behind the camera is a safety valve, to seperate yourself from sinking into the event and becoming part of it, which is what you don’t want to do. You don’t want to be part of the event. And the only real thing that you have to do is, not analyse why it’s happening, but analyse what’s happening and how to translate what’s happening into a good picture. You are that eye, you are that reporter, you are that photojournalist.
Sign up for the Daily Briefing
Get the latest news and updates straight to your inbox