The discussion of Iran and its nuclear ambitions have always been a topic of much debate, which takes on a different dimension when preparation for the US elections begins. It is unquestionable that the matter is serious — but what is important is that it should not be turned into an item on the agenda as and when it serves a political purpose.
For the candidates running in the American elections, Iran's nuclear ambitions — for obvious reasons — have become a favourite topic of debate. Almost all of the Republican presidential candidates have raised the alarm of a militarised, nuclear Iran. Some have gone to the extent of openly stating that they would be willing to go to war in order to keep Iran from attaining nuclear weapons.
The decision of Iran to adopt the route of building nuclear weapons is alarming as its ramifications affect an entire region and the world. But there are measures that need to be followed before making a final decision. Ensuring that Iran does not become a military nuclear power would require international effort and monitoring. Hence, threatening to start a war is the easiest route — yet one that should never be used as part of an election campaign.
