Please register to access this content.
To continue viewing the content you love, please sign in or create a new account
Dismiss
This content is for our paying subscribers only

Entertainment Hollywood

What led to Danny Masterson’s rape retrial and what happens next

The actor, who has been found guilty, faces up to 30 years in prison for rape



Danny Masterson and his wife Bijou Phillips arrive for closing arguments in his second rape trial, Tuesday, May 16, 2023, in Los Angeles. Masterson is charged with raping three women at his Los Angeles home between 2001 and 2003.
Image Credit: AP

A Los Angeles jury on Wednesday convicted actor Danny Masterson of two counts of rape in a retrial that focused on allegations the "That ‘70s Show’ star raped three women between 2001 and 2003.

The verdict sided with two of Masterson's accusers, but the panel was unable to reach a verdict on similar allegations by a longtime girlfriend of Masterson.

The actor, who was led from court in handcuffs after being a free man throughout the proceedings, faces 30 years to life in prison when he is sentenced. The second trial made the Church of Scientology, which Masterson is a member of, a prominent element.

FILE PHOTO: Actor Danny Masterson is arraigned on three rape charges in separate incidents between 2001 and 2003, at Los Angeles Superior Court, Los Angeles, California, U.S., September 18, 2020. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson/File Photo
Image Credit: REUTERS

Here are some of the key elements that emerged during the three-week retrial and what's next for the actor.

Advertisement

WHAT'S NEXT FOR MASTERSON

The actor will remain in custody while he awaits sentencing, which hasn't been scheduled yet.

The women Masterson is convicted of raping could give victim impact statements during the sentencing hearing, and the judge is likely to hear from Masterson supporters.

Masterson's lawyers didn't address the verdict immediately after it happened, but they're likely to appeal.

DIRECT DISCUSSION OF DRUGGING

A judge in the second trial allowed the prosecution to say directly that Masterson drugged all three women before raping them, in what may be the biggest difference from the first trial. Previously, the drugging could only be implied when the women testified to feeling disoriented, losing memory and going unconscious to a degree that could not be explained by the alcohol they had consumed.

“The defendant drugs his victims to gain control. He does this to take away his victims’ ability to consent,” Deputy District Attorney Ariel Anson told jurors during her closing argument May 16.

Advertisement

The defense says there is no such evidence beyond the women's stories, and suggested the prosecution was using the stories because of the absence of evidence of any force or violence. Defense attorney Philip Cohen made clear to jurors that ”there is no drugging charge."

A BIGGER ROLE FOR SCIENTOLOGY

The Church of Scientology loomed large at Masterson's trial. It played a bigger role in his retrial , with Judge Charlaine Olmedo allowing expert testimony on Scientology that she denied the first time.

The Church of Scientology of Los Angeles is pictured, Friday, April 21, 2023, on Sunset Blvd. in Los Angeles. Actor Danny Masterson is going back on trial on three charges of rape. A deadlocked jury led to a mistrial for Masterson in November. The new trial should see a bigger role for the Church of Scientology. Masterson and the three women he's accused of raping were all members at the time, and the women say the church protected him and kept them from going to authorities. (AP Photo/Chris Pizzello)
Image Credit: AP

Masterson is a prominent member of the church. All three of his accusers are former members who grew disillusioned with the institution in the aftermath of their alleged assaults. 

Scientology said in a statement that “the Church has no policy prohibiting or discouraging members from reporting criminal conduct of anyone—Scientologists or not—to law enforcement,” and that it “explicitly demands Scientologists abide by all laws of the land.”

Advertisement

The prosecution's expert, Claire Headley, was a former official in Scientology leadership who became a staunch church foe, suing it in 2009 over her experience. (A federal court rejected claims from Headley and her husband, saying they had not provided enough evidence that the church had engaged in forced labor and violated human trafficking laws and that they had many chances to leave the leadership group known as the Sea Org. An appeals court upheld the decision.)

The church said after the verdict that “the prosecution’s introduction of religion into this trial was an unprecedented violation of the First Amendment and affects the due process rights of every American. The Church was not a party to this case and religion did not belong in this proceeding.”

THE DEFENDANT

Masterson, 47, an actor since childhood, got his major break when he was cast as Stephen Hyde on the retro sitcom “That '70s Show,” which also starred Ashton Kutcher, Mila Kunis and Topher Grace and would run on Fox from 1998 until 2006. At the time of the alleged assaults, his career was at its peak, and his house near Hollywood with a backyard pool and Jacuzzi was a social hub. It was also, according to prosecutors, the scene of all three crimes. Masterson had pleaded not guilty and his lawyers have repeatedly denied all of the allegations.

THE FIRST ACCUSER

One of the women Masterson is convicted of raping was born into a Scientology family and was part of Masterson's circle of friends. Nearly all of those closest to her were members, including the late Lisa Marie Presley , who also left the church long before her death in January.

The woman said that when she stopped by Masterson's house to pick up a set of keys in 2003, he gave her a drink that left her sick and badly disoriented, and raped her in his bedroom upstairs. She first filed a police report, which did not lead to an arrest, in 2004. She returned to authorities in 2016.

Advertisement

Jurors found her account credible and convicted Masterson based on her allegations.

The Associated Press does not typically name people who say they were victims of sexual abuse.

THE SECOND ACCUSER

A model and actor who was Masterson's girlfriend from 1996 to 2002 took the stand to open the trial. She previously testified that Masterson grew increasingly physically and sexually abusive in their years together. She said that it eventually led to him raping her twice late in 2001, though he is only charged with one instance, a morning when she woke to find Masterson raping her. She would go to police 15 years later.

Jurors could not agree on a verdict on her allegations, deadlocking 8-4 in favor of conviction.

THE THIRD ACCUSER

The third woman at the center of the trial had only recently met Masterson through mutual friends in the church, which she had joined as a teenager. She testified that in 2003 that Masterson invited her to his house, where they were alone. She said she was clear that she wanted no sex , but he convinced her to get into his jacuzzi then took her to his bed, where he raped her. She went to police in 2017.

Advertisement

Jurors convicted Masterson based on her testimony.

INVESTIGATION AND ARREST

Police revealed they were investigating Masterson in March of 2017. Hollywood's #MeToo firestorm would begin about six months later, and in the midst of it Masterson would be written off “The Ranch,” a Netflix Western comedy where he had reunited with Kutcher.

Danny Masterson, left, starred with Ashton Kutcher in 'The Ranch'.
Image Credit: instagram.com/dannymasterson

He was arrested and charged with three rapes in 2020, and in 2021 a judge ruled the evidence was strong enough for him to be tried.

THE FIRST TRIAL

Masterson's monthlong first trial began last October. Masterson, free on bail, was accompanied to court by a large group of friends and family with ties to both Scientology and the entertainment industry, including his wife and the mother of his child, actor and model Bijou Phillips.

Advertisement

In the end, fewer than half of jurors voted to convict on any of the counts. Nevertheless, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office decided to try again with a new set of jurors, and the women agreed to take the stand again.

Advertisement