Iran’s Hormuz tolls defy global law, set dangerous precedent

Dubai: Iran’s move to impose and reportedly collect tolls from ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz marks a direct challenge to international law and a dangerous escalation in its confrontation with the United States and its allies.

A senior Iranian parliament official has claimed that Tehran has already received its first revenue from ships transiting the vital waterway — one of the world’s most critical oil corridors — even as global powers warn that such actions violate long-standing maritime norms.

If confirmed, the development would signal not just defiance, but a fundamental breach of the rules governing international waters — rules that have underpinned global trade and energy security for decades.

At the heart of the controversy is the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which guarantees the right of “transit passage” through key international chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz.

Under these rules, ships must be allowed to pass freely and without interference. Charging tolls — effectively monetising passage through a shared global waterway — is widely seen by legal experts as illegal.

Even though Iran has not formally ratified the treaty, its principles are broadly accepted as customary international law, meaning they apply regardless of formal adoption.

That makes Tehran’s actions not just controversial, but a direct assault on a system that relies heavily on mutual compliance rather than enforcement.

The Strait of Hormuz is no ordinary waterway. Roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply passes through its narrow shipping lanes, making it one of the most strategically sensitive routes on the planet.

The UAE has been at the forefront of calls not to weaponise Hormuz, with Sultan Al Jaber, Minister of Industry and Advanced Technology, stating the strait “has never been Iran’s to close or restrict.”

By demanding tolls — reportedly enforced alongside its Revolutionary Guard — Iran is effectively weaponising geography, turning a global trade artery into a bargaining chip in its conflict with Washington and its allies.

The move follows weeks of disruption in the strait, where attacks on vessels and military escalation have already sent shipping traffic plunging and oil markets into volatility.

Now, toll collection risks formalising that disruption — converting a temporary crisis into a structured system of coercion.

The implications go far beyond the Gulf.

For decades, even countries that did not formally sign UNCLOS — including Iran and the United States — largely adhered to its rules, reinforcing stability in international waters.

That fragile consensus is now under threat.

Experts warn that if Iran succeeds in imposing tolls, it could trigger a domino effect, encouraging other countries controlling strategic chokepoints to follow suit.

Such a shift would fundamentally alter global shipping, increasing costs, disrupting supply chains and introducing new geopolitical risks into maritime trade.

One of the key challenges is enforcement.

International maritime law lacks strong policing mechanisms. Bodies like the International Court of Justice or maritime tribunals can issue rulings — but cannot compel compliance.

That leaves enforcement largely dependent on political will.

Countries could respond through sanctions, naval escorts, or coordinated pressure on companies not to pay tolls. But each option carries risks of escalation, particularly in an already volatile region.

The United States has already warned it could target vessels that comply with Iran’s toll demands — a move that could further militarise commercial shipping lanes.

Beyond legality, the economic consequences are significant.

Even modest tolls would increase shipping costs, feeding into higher oil and gas prices globally. But analysts say the bigger impact lies in uncertainty — with companies rerouting shipments, delaying cargo, or avoiding the strait altogether.

That disruption is already visible, with traffic sharply reduced and energy markets reacting to each new development.

At its core, Iran’s toll move is about more than revenue.

It is a test — of how far a country can push against international norms, and how willing the world is to respond.

If left unchecked, it risks normalising the idea that strategic waterways can be controlled, priced and leveraged for political gain.

For a global system built on open seas and predictable rules, that would mark a profound and potentially lasting shift.