Copy of 426566-01-08-1567419034099
Israeli regime paramedics and soldiers evacuate an allegedly mock wounded comrade at a helipad in Ramban hospital in Haifa on Sunday as part of a deception operation of the Israeli occupation army in order to mislead the leadership of Hezbollah. Image Credit: AFP

Beirut - Lebanon’s Hezbollah militant group and the Israeli regime traded fire on Sunday along their frontier, in a spat that came after a week of heightened tensions between the two rivals.

Are both sides heading towards a repeat of a deadly 2006 war or was the latest carefully weighted exchange a sign they will step back from all-out conflict?

Analysts lean towards the latter but warn that Israel and Hezbollah don’t hold all the cards.

Frontier flare-up?

Hezbollah on Sunday said it destroyed a military vehicle in northern Israel. The Israeli regime’s army said it responded with around 100 artillery shells.

Israeli regime officials refuted Hezbollah claims that it had killed and wounded those inside the military vehicle, saying there were no casualties.

The episode came amid soaring tensions after Israel targeted Hezbollah with an air strike in Syria on August 24, which the Iran-backed group said killed two of its members.

Hezbollah also accused Israel of conducting a separate drone attack hours later in its southern Beirut stronghold, an incident it described as the most serious attack on Lebanon since the 2006 conflict.

Hezbollah said the unit behind Sunday’s attack on northern Israel was named after its two militants killed in the Syria strike.

“This is a clear message that this is a response to the attack in Syria... and not a response to the (Beirut) drone attack,” said Hezbollah expert Amal Saad.

Hezbollah’s number two Naim Qassem in an interview with Russia Today last week played down talk of a fresh war.

“The atmosphere is an atmosphere of response to an aggression,” he said.

Incident closed?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said after Sunday’s attack that his government was mulling the next steps: “I have ordered that we be prepared for any scenario.”

Experts expect tensions to ease off, at least temporarily.

Saad said Hezbollah may be planning a separate response to the Beirut drone attack “further down the line”, saying it may be “low key”.

“I don’t think it would be the kind of attack that would ignite a war by any means,” she said.

An official close to Hezbollah told AFP that the second part of the retaliation “will be aerial and confront Israeli drones”.

Analyst Karim Bitar said he would expect the tit-for-tat to end here if was up to Hezbollah and Israel.

“There is no real interest among the two parties for a rapid escalation,” he said.

But a de-escalation is contingent on the state of affairs between Hezbollah and Israel’s respective main allies, Tehran and Washington.

“The Trump administration’s policy of maximum pressure on Tehran not only aims to weaken the Iranian economy, but also aims to crush Iran’s wings by weakening its regional partners in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon,” Bitar said.

Another element of concern is Israel’s September 17 election, Bitar said.

“The history of the last 20 years shows that election periods are sometimes conducive to flare-ups,” he said.

Copy of AP9_2_2019_000004B-1567419040151
Lebanese journalists and villagers watch as Israeli regime shells cause fires on the southern Lebanese frontier village of Maroun Al Ras Sunday.

Balance of deterrence?

In 2006, after the killing and abduction of Israeli soldiers by Hezbollah, Israel launched a devastating offensive in Lebanon.

The 33-day war killed 1,200 Lebanese - mostly civilians - and 160 Israelis, mostly soldiers.

Israel has since carried out hundreds of strikes against Hezbollah targets in Syria, where the Iran-backed party has deployed thousands of fighters since 2013 to help the regime battle rebels and extremists.

Israel killed senior Hezbollah figures in separate attacks in 2015. In both cases, the group responded with attacks along the frontier.

Analysts and Hezbollah’s number two Naim Qassem himself, speaking to the movement TV channel, said Sunday’s attack was aimed at maintaining “a balance of deterrence”.

“Hezbollah firmly believes that any response is a move that is actually preventing war,” Amal Saad said.

Hezbollah, which has grown into Iran’s most powerful regional proxy, wields huge influence in Lebanese politics and its military might is said to outstrip the state’s.

Israel’s military capabilities, which include cutting-edge technology and a fleet of the world’s most advanced fighter jets, are vastly superior.

But reports that Hezbollah is acquiring precision-guided missiles with Iran’s help are raising alarm in Israel.