New York: The scheme was as brazen as it was elaborate: Dozens of wealthy parents, according to court documents filed Tuesday, paid millions of dollars in bribes to secure the admission of their children into elite universities in the US.
Test scores were inflated, essays were falsified and photographs were doctored, all in an illicit effort to gain entry to schools such as Yale, the University of Southern California and Georgetown.
The back door is through institutional advancement, which is 10 times as much money. And I’ve created this side door in.
“We help the wealthiest families in the US get their kids into school,” said William Singer, the founder of The Edge College & Career Network, also known as The Key, in a phone call with a parent he was helping to cheat, according to the charging documents. “There is a front door which means you get in on your own. The back door is through institutional advancement, which is 10 times as much money. And I’ve created this side door in.”
Here is how Singer helped dozens of parents, including high-profile Hollywood actors and wealthy business leaders, get their children into top schools, according to the charging documents.
Singer would instruct parents to seek special circumstances for their children to take the SAT or ACT, the required standardised tests for acceptance to four-year universities. Parents would use medical documentation to claim their children had a learning disability. The students would then be given a chance to take the tests in a room with only a proctor, and sometimes over two days. Then they would sign up to take the exams at either a public high school in Houston or a private college prep school in West Hollywood, California, two locations that Singer said he “controlled.” Singer would tell clients to come up with a reason they would be in Houston or Hollywood, such as a wedding.
Parents paid between $15,000 (Dh55,087) and $75,000 to Singer’s company so their children could be helped in one of three ways: Someone else would take the SAT or ACT exams for the student; a person would serve as the proctor and guide the students to the right answers; or someone would review and correct the students’ answers after the tests were taken. In one case, according to the documents, actress Felicity Huffman told Singer her daughter’s high school had its own exam proctor in mind.
Elisabeth Kimmel, the owner of a media company, used Singer’s services twice, first for her daughter in 2012, and then for her son in 2017, according to the documents. Her daughter attended Georgetown as a purported tennis recruit, and her son was accepted to the University of Southern California as a track-and-field pole-vaulter. But he was caught off guard during orientation. According to the documents, Jane Buckingham, who owns a boutique marketing firm in Los Angeles, agreed to pay $50,000 to Singer’s company so that someone other than her son would take the ACT. But the proctor would need to write the essay portion in a handwriting that mimicked her son’s.
According to the charging documents, after the exams were scored high enough so that the students became competitive applicants, the parents paid bribes — structured as donations to the university and funnelled through The Key — to university coaches, who would identify their children as athletic recruits. A doctored image of the daughter of Agustin Huneeus Jr., the owner of several vineyards in Napa and elsewhere, was edited onto a picture of a water polo player and described as a varsity athlete who had earned a team MVP, according to the charging documents.
In many cases, bogus achievements were added to college applications. In one case, the documents showed, a teenage girl who did not play soccer was identified as a star player. In her application, she was described as the co-captain of a prominent club soccer team in Southern California and was accepted as a recruit for the women’s soccer team at Yale. After acceptance into their chosen universities, according to details outlined in the charging documents, the parents would make significant payments to Singer’s company. The payments — often hundreds of thousands of dollars — were disguised as donations and would be funnelled through the organisation to the universities, the documents said, allowing the parents to claim tax deductions.