22 countries join drive to ensure safe Hormuz passage amid Iran naval mine threats: Nato

Military alliance, partners agree to ensure safe Hormuz passage amid Iran regime threats

Last updated:
Jay Hilotin, Senior Assistant Editor
Mark Rutte, Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato) and and former PM of the Netherlands, backed US actions against Iran, warning on Iran threat.
Mark Rutte, Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato) and and former PM of the Netherlands, backed US actions against Iran, warning on Iran threat.
Bloomberg

Washington: At least 22 countries had joined an initiative to ensure safe navigation in the Hormuz Strait, according to head of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato).

Mark Rutte, Secretary General of Nato military alliance, revealed that 22 nations — including both Nato members and partners such as Japan, South Korea, Australia — and the Gulf states have agreed to closely coordinate actions to ensure freedom of navigation in the narrow waterway.

His remarks came amid tensions within the alliance after President Donald Trump criticised Nato allies for not doing enough to support US operations, including securing shipping routes through Hormuz.

Allied coordination 'underway'

Rutte acknowledged the frustration but said allied coordination was now underway.

He noted that operational timelines remained under discussion, with military planners working on deployment details. “One of the key questions is… the when question,” he said.

Rutte's remarks address mounting frustration among allies over delays in responding to escalating threats in the Strait of Hormuz, amid missile exchanges between Iran, Israel, and proxies like Hezbollah.

With the Strait partially blocked by Iran in retaliation to Israeli strikes, global oil flows (20% of supply) are choked, spiking prices and freight rates. Trump has demanded immediate reopening, threatening Iranian infrastructure, while Starmer pushes diplomacy.

Allies are split: Some favour rapid naval escorts; others declared escorts will only be made following a ceasefire declaration.

Still, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands and Canada signalled unity alongside Japan on keeping the strait open, amid declarations by the Iranian regime to use the narrow strait as a "lever".

Backing US actions vs Iran

Rutte, in making the announcement, also backed US actions against Iran, warning that Tehran is “very close” to developing missile capabilities that could threaten Europe, even as Nato assessed reports of a long-range strike on a US-UK base in the Indian Ocean.

“These three questions are now worked through to answer the president's call, to make sure that we secure the free sailing through the Strait of Hormuz,” he said, referring to planning on “what do we need? When do we need it? And where do we need it?”

Speaking on CBS News’ “Face the Nation,” Rutte said Nato could not yet confirm claims that Iran had fired missiles at Diego Garcia, but stressed the implications if verified.

“We cannot confirm that at the moment, so we're looking into that,” he said. “But if this would be true, it is the more evidence that what the President is doing here… is crucial.”

Direct threat

He added that Iran was nearing the ability to strike major European cities.

“What we know for sure is that they are very close to having that capability,” he said, referring to the potential range of Iranian missiles.

Rutte warned that a combination of nuclear and missile capabilities in Iran would pose a global danger. “If Iran would have the nuclear capability, including, together with the missile capability, it will be a direct threat, an existential threat, to Israel, to the region, to Europe, to the stability in the world,” he said.

The Nato chief endorsed US efforts to degrade Iran’s military capabilities, arguing that delay could prove costly.

Tensions within Nato

Drawing a parallel with North Korea, he said, “If we negotiate for too long, you might pass the moment where you can still get this thing done.”

Responding to concerns that US pressure could strain Nato unity, Rutte emphasised that the alliance had historically come together during crises.

He cited increased defence spending commitments agreed under Trump’s leadership and ongoing cooperation on Ukraine.

“I understand the president's frustration that it takes some time,” he said, adding that allies had needed time to prepare due to the secrecy surrounding initial US actions.

On Ukraine, Rutte defended US diplomacy despite criticism over easing restrictions on Russian oil exports. He said Washington was balancing multiple priorities while pushing for a negotiated settlement.

“He has to balance all these different interests,” Rutte said. “His effort to bring the war in Ukraine to a successful end is crucial.”

Rutte, new in the post since late 2024, is coordinating Nato's first major collective response to a Middle East chokepoint crisis.

His comments followed a Brussels HQ briefing, signaling:

  • Allied coordination activated: Joint task force planning for minesweeping, patrols, and carrier groups.

  • Timeline to be discussed: "The when question" highlights debates—immediate vs. post-UN Security Council vote—balancing deterrence with de-escalation risks.

This echoes Nato's post-Ukraine playbook, prioritising unity amid US leadership under President Trump.

Planners eye "Article 4" consultations, potentially invoking "Article 5" if Iran targets Nato assets, including the UK-US base military base in the Indian Ocean, known as Diego Garcia, which Iran reportedly tried to hit with a long-range missile.

[With inputs from IANS]

Get Updates on Topics You Choose

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Up Next