ROME: In what is becoming a dangerous game of chicken for the global economy, Italy’s populist government refused to budge Tuesday after the European Union for the first time sent back a member state’s proposed budget because it violated the bloc’s fiscal laws and posed unacceptable risks.
The European Commission, the bloc’s administrative body, had repeatedly warned Italy to reduce the deficits in its 2019 draft budget to avoid heavy fines early next year. But Italy’s populist government, which has bristled against Europe’s austerity measures, went ahead and submitted a budget with a proposed deficit equal to 2.4 per cent of gross domestic product. That figure was considered much too high for a country whose total government debt equals 131 per cent of GDP, more than double the Eurozone limit.
As expected, the commission rejected the plan, saying that it included irresponsible deficit levels that would “suffocate” Italy, the third-largest economy in the Eurozone. Investors fear that the collapse of the Italian economy under its enormous debt could sink the entire Eurozone and hasten a global economic crisis unseen since 2008, or worse.
But Italy’s populists are not scared. They have repeatedly compared their budget, fat with unemployment welfare, pension increases and other benefits, to the New Deal measures of Franklin D. Roosevelt that helped America emerge from the Great Depression.
“The only thing that we have to fear is fear itself,” Luigi Di Maio, Italy’s vice premier and the leader of the anti-establishment Five Star Movement, told reporters as it became clear that the European Commission would reject the plan.
After the official rejection, Di Maio wrote on Facebook, “We know that we are on the right path, and therefore we won’t stop.”
His coalition partner and fellow vice premier, Matteo Salvini, the leader of the far-right League party, was equally scathing. “This doesn’t change anything. Let the speculators be reassured, we’re not going back,’’ he told reporters during a trip to Romania. “They’re not attacking a government but a people. These are things that will anger Italians even more.”
Italy has three weeks to revise its budget under the bloc’s rules, but the EU’s unprecedented response may just be the instigation to a fight that Di Maio and his coalition partners have been itching for.
Both the Five Star and the League ran for election this year in direct opposition to Brussels. With European Parliament elections on the horizon in May, it does not hurt their cause to reintroduce the spectre of a bureaucratic bogeyman preventing them from stimulating the Italian economy and delivering on their campaign promises.
All of which make for strong political arguments that resonate with angry Italian voters who have yet to recover from the last debt crisis. Still, the markets are less moved by the talking points.
Salvini and Di Maio have at times spoken with disgust or derision about the yield spread between Italian and German 10-year benchmark bonds as if it were just another political enemy to be demonised or ridiculed. (The “spread,” Salvini has joked, is what he put on his breakfast bread.)
But the spread is no joke. Detested as it might be among Italy’s populist politicians, it has become perhaps the international markets’ most powerful judgement of the health of Eurozone economies.
In the 2011 European bond crises, it laid waste to the bloc’s governments — including, notably, that of former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, who was forced to resign because of a lack of confidence from the international markets.
Giuseppe Conte, the prime minister of Italy, has suggested that leaders in Brussels have sought to raise fears about the Italian economy in order to spike the spread and force his government to bow to European rules. Di Maio has said “enemies of the people” were working to increase the spread.
The question for Italy, and all of Europe, is how far Italy’s government is willing to go. Will it be forced into submission by the gravity of economic reality? Or will Italian leaders convince their voters that the country’s financial health is worth risking in order to blow up a political and economic establishment that they say is stripping Italians of their sovereignty?
And Brussels must decide how strict it will be. Loath to let a member state slide for fear that it would loosen the ties that bind the union, its leaders must ask themselves if that is worse than an open revolt.
“Breaking rules can appear tempting at a first look,” said Valdis Dombrovskis, the European Commission’s vice president in charge of the euro and financial stability.
“It can provide the illusion of breaking free,’’ he added. ‘’It is tempting to try to cure debt with more debt. But at some point, the debt weighs too heavy, and at the end of the day, you end up having no freedom at all.”
Dombrovskis called Italy’s budget “consciously going against commitments made” and said “the ball is now in the court of Italy’s government.”
That ball has already wrought havoc inside the Italian government.
At the end of September, Italy’s populists agreed on a budget that delivered on the priorities of both the Five Star, which sought a broad unemployment benefit, and the League, which wanted a flat tax for small business owners. It also included more generous pension benefits, allowing people to retire at 62 if they had contributed for 38 years, which both parties campaigned on.
“In a decisive manner, with this measure, with this budget, we will have abolished poverty,” Di Maio said at the time.
—New York Times News Service