Primate fossil not related to humans

New York : Her arrival was announced with unrestrained razzmatazz. She was the "eighth wonder of the world", "our Mona Lisa" and an evolutionary "Rosetta Stone", according to the researchers who unveiled her.

Last updated:
1 MIN READ

The female in question was Ida, a 47million-year-old primate, whose exquisitely preserved fossil was touted as the remains of our earliest human ancestor. She was, they said, the "link" between us and the rest of the animal kingdom. Or maybe not.

Writing in the journal, Nature, a team of palaeontologists from New York claim that Ida is not related to humans at all. Instead, they conclude, the $1 million (Dh3.6 million) fossil looks more like a small lemur or maybe a loris.

Slugging match

The challenge is being seen as the opening salvo in what is shaping up to be a hearty academic slugging match. "Our analysis and results have convinced us that Ida was not an ancestor of monkeys, apes, or humans, and if anything has more relevance for our understanding of lemur and loris origins," said Erik Seiffert, a fossil hunter at Stony Brook University in New York who led the Nature study.

Researchers behind the Ida fossil, known formally as Darwinius masillae, defended their own interpretation. "We expected a challenge like this and it's interesting it has taken five months for the first attack to come," said Jrn Hurum, a palaeontologist at Oslo University's Natural History Museum. "What we claim about Ida is really quite controversial."

Sign up for the Daily Briefing

Get the latest news and updates straight to your inbox

Up Next