CIA urged Obama to keep 'sleep torture'

Washington: As President Barack Obama prepared last month to release secret memos on the CIA's use of severe interrogation methods, the White House fielded a flurry of last-minute appeals.

One came from former CIA Director Michael V. Hayden, who expressed disbelief that the administration was prepared to expose methods it might later decide it needed.

"Are you telling me that under all conditions of threat, you will never interfere with the sleep cycle of a detainee?" Hayden asked a top White House official, according to sources familiar with the exchange.

From the beginning, sleep deprivation had been one of the most important elements in the CIA's interrogation programme, used to help break dozens of suspected terrorists, far more than the most violent approaches. And it is among the methods the agency fought hardest to keep.

The technique is now prohibited by Obama's ban in January on harsh interrogation methods, although a task force is reviewing its use along with other interrogation methods the agency might employ in the future.

Because of the perception that it was less objectionable than waterboarding, head-slamming or forced nudity, sleep deprivation may be seen as a tempting technique to restore.

But the Justice Department memos released last month by Obama, as well as information provided by officials familiar with the programme, indicate that the method, which involves forcing chained prisoners to stand, sometimes for days on end, was more controversial within the US intelligence community than was widely known. A CIA inspector general's report issued in 2004 was more critical of the agency's use of sleep deprivation than it was of any other method besides waterboarding, according to officials familiar with the document, because of how sleep deprivation was applied.

The prisoners had their feet shackled to the floor and their hands cuffed close to their chins, according to the Justice Department memos.

Detainees were clad only in diapers and not allowed to feed themselves. A prisoner who started to drift off to sleep would tilt over and be caught by his chains.

The memos said more than 25 of the CIA's prisoners were subjected to sleep deprivation. At one point, the agency was allowed to keep prisoners awake as long as 11 days; the limit was later reduced to just over a week.

According to the memos, medical personnel were to make sure prisoners weren't injured. But a Red Cross report on the CIA programme said detainees' wrists and ankles bore scars from their shackles.

In the Justice Department memos, sleep deprivation was described as part of a "baseline" phase of interrogation, categorised as less severe than other "corrective" or "coercive" methods.

Within the CIA, sleep deprivation was seen as a method with the unique advantage of eroding prisoners' will to resist without causing lasting harm.

In Should Obama ban sleep torture? Do you think all forms of torture should be banned? Would torture be acceptable if it meant saving lives?

I believe there's no harm in torturing those who do not think even once before taking an innocent life/lives.
From A Reader
Dubai,UAE
Posted: May 11, 2009, 11:33