New York: Elon Musk clinched a deal to buy Twitter Inc for $44 billion cash on Monday in a transaction that will shift control of the social media platform populated by millions of users and global leaders to the world’s richest person.
It is a seminal moment for the 16-year-old company that emerged as one of the world’s most influential public squares and now faces a string of challenges.
Musk has criticized Twitter’s moderation, calling himself a free speech absolutist, said that Twitter’s algorithm for prioritizing tweets should be public and criticized giving too much power on the service to corporations that advertise.
- Twitter CEO Parag Agarwal: Company in dark over future under Musk
- In Pictures: Twitter will serve up a ‘poison pill’ to Elon Musk
- Twitter board’s interest not aligned with holders, says Musk
- Elon Musk secures $46.5 billion funding for Twitter bid
- In Pictures: Will Musk-Twitter be the tech's next mega-deal?
Political conservatives hope that a Musk regime would mean less moderation and reinstatement of banned individuals including former President Donald Trump. Musk himself also has described user-friendly tweaks to the service, such as an edit button and defeating “spam bots” that send overwhelming amounts of unwanted tweets.
Discussions over the deal, which last week appeared uncertain, accelerated over the weekend after Musk wooed Twitter shareholders with financing details of his offer.
Under pressure, Twitter started negotiating with Musk to buy the company at the proposed $54.20 per share price.
“Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated,” Musk said in a statement.
Twitter shares rose 5.7 per cent on Monday to close at $51.70. The deal represents a near 40 per cent premium to the closing price the day before Musk disclosed he had bought a more than 9 per cent stake.
Even so, the offer is below the $70 range where Twitter was trading last year.
“I think if the company were given enough time to transform, we would have made substantially more than what Musk is currently offering,” said Jonathan Boyar, managing director at Boyar Value Group, which holds a stake in Twitter.
However, he added, “this transaction reinforces our belief that if the public markets do not properly value a company, an acquirer eventually will.” Musks move continues a tradition of billionaires buying control of influential media platforms that include Rupert Murdochs takeover of the New York Post in 1976 and the Wall Street Journal in 2007 and Jeff Bezos 2013 acquisition of the Washington Post.
Twitter said Musk secured $25.5 billion of debt and margin loan financing and is providing a $21 billion equity commitment.
Musk, who is worth $268 billion according to Forbes, has said he is not primarily concerned with the economics of Twitter.
“Having a public platform that is maximally trusted and broadly inclusive is extremely important to the future of civilization. I don’t care about the economics at all,” he said in a recent public talk.
Musk is chief executive of electric car maker Tesla Inc and aerospace company SpaceX, and it is not clear how he much time he will devote to Twitter.
“This is great news for Twitter shareholders as it doesnt seem like the company was going to get things right anytime soon. Tesla shareholders cant be happy that Musk will have to divert even more attention away from winning the EV (electric vehicle) race,” Edward Moya, and analyst at currency broker OANDA, said in an email to clients.
Still, Musk’s 80 million-strong Twitter account is seen as an important, free public relations tool for Tesla.
The Twitter transaction was approved by the board and is now subject to a shareholder vote. No regulatory hurdles are expected, analysts said.
Daniel Ives, an analyst at Wedbush, said the company’s board of directors had its back “against the wall” once Musk detailed his financing package and no other bidders or white knights emerged.
It was not immediately clear what the breakup fee would be or who would run the new company.
Twitter’s outsized importance as a mouthpiece for politicians, political dissidents and activists belies its relatively small size.
Although it is only about a tenth of the size of far larger social media platforms like Meta Platforms Inc’s Facebook, it has been credited with helping spawn the Arab Spring uprising and accused of playing a role in the Jan. 6, 2021, storming of the US Capitol.
After Twitter banned former President Donald Trump over concerns around incitement of violence following last year’s US Capitol attack by his supporters, Musk tweeted: “A lot of people are going to be super unhappy with West Coast high tech as the de facto arbiter of free speech.” Trump, whose company is building a rival to Twitter called Truth Social, said he will not return to Twitter, according to a Fox News interview.
The White House declined on Monday to comment on Musk’s deal, but said that President Joe Biden has long been concerned about the power of social media platforms.
“Our concerns are not new,” said White House spokesperson Jen Psaki, adding that the platforms need to be held accountable. “The president has long talked about his concerns about the power of social media platforms, including Twitter and others, to spread misinformation.”