Assigning premium seats for resting flight crew adds up to quite a bit of lost revenues
In the hyper-competitive landscape of global aviation - where every inch of cabin space is meticulously optimized - one persistent inefficiency quietly erodes airline margins: the blocking of revenue-generating Business Class seats for flight crew rest, even on aircraft equipped with designated crew rest facilities.
Singapore Airlines, among others, routinely blocks one to two Business Class seats for flight deck crew on ultra-long-haul and long-haul rotations. This practice continues even on aircraft such as the Airbus A350-900ULR and Boeing 777-300ER, which feature fully enclosed crew rest modules separate from the passenger cabin.
The revenue impact is far from marginal.
A single long-haul Business Class seat can yield between $4,000 and $10,000 per flight, depending on route and demand. On a daily ultra-long-haul service, blocking two seats translates into an annual opportunity cost of approximately $2.9 million to $7.3 million per route, per aircraft. Across a long-haul fleet of 30 or more aircraft, the cumulative impact could easily approach $100 million to $150 million annually - a material figure for any airline’s P&L.
Beyond direct financial loss lies a more insidious consequence: the erosion of customer trust and loyalty.
Premium passengers, often informed at booking or check-in that Business Class is ‘fully booked,’ may observe unoccupied seats throughout the flight. Upon learning that these are reserved for flight crew - despite the presence of pilot bunks - passengers experience confusion and a sense of unfairness.
For high-yield customers who expect transparency, exclusivity, and service excellence, such contradictions undermine brand credibility. In an era where Business Class represents not merely a seat, but a meticulously curated experience, inconsistencies in cabin policy directly impact brand differentiation and repeat business.
The rationale for this practice is historical. Prior to regulatory mandates for crew rest areas, pilots often rested in premium cabins during long-haul operations. However, today’s aircraft are designed with dedicated rest modules, ensuring high-quality rest aligned with circadian rhythms, while maintaining a physical separation from paying passengers.
Continuing to reserve Business Class seats for cockpit crew is no longer aligned with modern yield management practices. It paradoxically diminishes the return on substantial investments airlines are making in Business Class innovation - from private suites to à la carte dining and personalized service.
Some may argue that crew rest compartments - particularly Cabin Crew Rest Compartments (CRCs), which can weigh up to eight tonnes - impose a weight penalty, and that selectively equipping aircraft optimizes operating economics. While operationally sound, this logic should not be conflated with justifying Business Class seat blocking.
First, pilot rest modules are typically separate and far lighter than CRCs. Second, the marginal fuel savings from omitting a CRC are dwarfed by the commercial damage inflicted by removing premium seats from inventory. Blocking high-yield inventory for non-revenue purposes reflects a tactical, short-term focus at the expense of long-term revenue integrity.
Some carriers cite operational flexibility, contingency planning, or union agreements as barriers. Yet leading airlines such as Emirates, Qatar Airways, and Lufthansa have successfully transitioned to exclusive use of crew rest bunks for flight deck crew on long-haul sectors. These examples demonstrate that operational safety and commercial optimization are not mutually exclusive.
In an environment where profitability is under constant pressure - from fuel price volatility to rising environmental costs and escalating customer expectations - no premium seat should be left unmonetized without rigorous strategic justification.
Based on our project experience with leading carriers, we recommend three immediate actions:
Audit and quantify: Conduct a route-by-route financial analysis to accurately assess the impact of seat blocking practices.
Align stakeholders: Engage collaboratively with flight operations, HR, and unions to develop alternative rest protocols and policy updates.
Optimize and reinforce: Update SOPs to default to dedicated crew bunks, ensuring Business Class seats are reserved exclusively for high-revenue passengers, guided by real-time demand and upgrade models.
We often remind our clients: every seat is a business decision.
In today’s aviation industry, maintaining practices that unnecessarily allocate premium seats to non-revenue purposes is a remnant of a bygone era. Strategic leadership demands that every asset onboard drives maximum value - both financially and in terms of customer loyalty.
Sign up for the Daily Briefing
Get the latest news and updates straight to your inbox