The women alleged that the guarantee cheque they had signed was prematurely submitted
The Abu Dhabi Family, Civil, and Administrative Claims Court upheld a judgment issued by the Court of First Instance, ordering two women to return Dh1.5 million and pay Dh250,000 in compensation to another woman in a gold rental case.
The plaintiff had filed a lawsuit against the two women, requesting that they be jointly ordered to pay her Dh1.5 million, representing the value of the gold they had taken, in addition to Dh800,000 and legal interest of 12% from the date the case was filed until full settlement. She also demanded that they bear all fees, expenses, and attorney costs.
The lawsuit was based on the fact that the plaintiff had rented gold worth Dh1.5 million to the two defendants for Dh157,000. The two women signed a promissory note and a guarantee cheque for the value of the gold, but later sold it. Consequently, the plaintiff filed a criminal complaint, which resulted in a ruling against them. Their actions caused her both financial damage—through the loss of the gold and lost profits—and moral harm.
The Court of First Instance ordered the two defendants, jointly, to pay the plaintiff Dh1.5 million along with Dh250,000 as comprehensive compensation.
Dissatisfied with the ruling, the defendants appealed, claiming that the plaintiff had based her lawsuit on their signatures on a promissory note for receiving gold jewelry worth Dh1.5 million. They argued, however, that the actual agreement was an installment purchase arrangement, with the real value of the gold amounting to Dh700,000. They further alleged that the guarantee cheque they had signed was prematurely submitted to the bank by the plaintiff as a pretext for filing the complaint, since she wished to retract the sale after gold prices began to rise.
Nevertheless, the Abu Dhabi Family, Civil, and Administrative Claims Court rejected these arguments and upheld the ruling of the Court of First Instance, obligating the two defendants to return Dh1.5 million and pay Dh250,000 in compensation to the plaintiff in the gold rental case.
Sign up for the Daily Briefing
Get the latest news and updates straight to your inbox