OSLO
Norway’s trillion-dollar sovereign wealth fund is proposing to drop oil and gas companies from its benchmark index, which would mean cutting its investments in those companies, the deputy central bank chief supervising the fund told Reuters.
If accepted by the finance ministry and adopted by parliament, the fund would over time divest billions of dollars from oil and gas stocks, which now represent 6 per cent — or around $37 billion — of the fund’s benchmark equity index.
The proposal came in a letter sent by the central bank to the finance ministry and signed by its governor, Oeystein Olsen, and the chief executive of the fund, Yngve Slyngsad, Deputy Central Bank Governor Egil Matsen said in an interview.
It aims to reduce the exposure of the fund — and therefore the Norwegian government — to oil price fluctuations.
Oil and gas stocks would be replaced by investments in other companies.
“Our advice is to simply remove the oil and gas sector, as it is defined in the FTSE reference index, from the fund’s reference index,” Matsen said.
“That would mean all companies that the FTSE has classified with the sector, should be removed from our reference index.” The fund is the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund. It invests Norway’s revenues from oil and gas production for future generations in stocks, bonds and real estate abroad.
It is among the largest investors in a wide range of oil companies, holding stakes at the end of 2016 of 2.3 per cent in Royal Dutch Shell, 1.7 per cent of BP, 0.9 per cent of Chevron and 0.8 per cent of Exxon Mobil.
It also held 1.7 per cent of Italy’s Eni, 1.6 per cent of France’s Total and 0.9 per cent of Sweden’s Lundin Petroleum, among others.
At the end of the third quarter, Royal Dutch Shell was the fund’s third-biggest equity investment overall, worth around $5.34 billion and exceeded only by its ownership in Apple and Nestle.
“It clearly stands out, perhaps not surprisingly, but not obviously, that indeed there is a substantial difference ... in return between the oil and gas sector and the broad stock market in periods when the oil price changes substantially,” Matsen said.
“Oil price exposure of the government’s wealth position can be reduced by not having the fund invested in oil and gas stocks.” The fund could still invest in the sector if other parts of the fund’s mandate are fulfilled by having some investments in some of the companies, Matsen said.
“But clearly the direction is that ... if the ministry and the politicians think it is good advice and they say yes to it, clearly the investments in the oil and gas sector will decrease over time,” he added.
