Five things to know about the new findings
Washington: US President Donald Trump on Saturday again denied that his presidential campaign colluded with Russian operatives, but made no comment on claims that he directly organised hush payments to ward off a possible sex scandal during his White House run.
Trump took to Twitter, his favorite means of communication, to address the multiple court filings that dropped on Friday in connection with special counsel Robert Mueller's sweeping investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.
"AFTER TWO YEARS AND MILLIONS OF PAGES OF DOCUMENTS (and a cost of over $30,000,000), NO COLLUSION!" the president said.
But while the filings did not appear to reveal evidence of collusion, they did offer a wealth of new information about what Mueller's team is looking into.
Federal prosecutors directly implicated Trump in efforts to buy the silence of two women who claimed they had had affairs with him, saying he directed his then-attorney Michael Cohen to offer them hush money.
In August, Cohen pleaded guilty to violating campaign finance law in connection with the payments.
They also said that Cohen was in contact with a Russian national as far back as November 2015 - months before Trump formally won the presidential nomination - who offered "synergy on a government level."
And prosecutors accused Trump's onetime campaign manager Paul Manafort of multiple "lies" to investigators: about his contacts with administration officials even after striking a plea deal; about a debt payment he made; and about his interaction with a suspected Russian intelligence officer.
New revelations in Russia probe: five things to know
Earlier approach from Russia
The filings reinforce a narrative about repeated Russian attempts to curry favor with Trump.
No specific claim of collusion has yet been made - as Trump underscored in a tweet Saturday - but one filing revealed a contact with Trump's then lawyer Michael Cohen as early as November 2015 by a Russian man claiming to offer "synergy on a government level" with Moscow.
Trump 'ordered' illegal hush payments
Trump, referred to in the documents as "Individual-1," was directly implicated in ordering Cohen to make illegal payments to two women - Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal - to ensure their silence about alleged sexual affairs.
There is no question that Trump is "Individual-1," as prosecutors note: "On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States."
Manafort told 'multiple lies'
Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort is said to have told prosecutors "multiple discernible lies" about matters including his contacts with a reputed Russian intelligence agent and with the Trump administration, thereby breaching the terms of an earlier guilty plea.
Manafort was convicted in August of several counts of financial fraud and witness tampering, pleaded guilty to a second set of charges in September, and is currently in jail.
'Substantial' jail time sought for Cohen
Prosecutors sought "substantial" jail time for Cohen, citing a "pattern of deception" and saying, "his offenses strike at several pillars of our society and system of government: the payment of taxes, transparent and fair elections; and truthfulness before government and in business”.
He is to be sentenced Wednesday on charges filed earlier.
Mueller has yet to complete his investigation and issue his report. Democrats are demanding that it be made public, although that has yet to be decided.
For all of Trump's denials of colluding with Russia, Mueller has yet to publicly address that fundamental question.
But Trump has now been named as having directed someone - Cohen - to commit a crime. Pressure on the president can only increase in coming days and weeks.
There is a general consensus in the legal community that Trump cannot be charged while serving as president. But once he leaves office, his legal future could change.
Democrats could also launch the process of impeachment in the US House of Representatives when they take control in January, but with Republicans controlling the Senate that would be unlikely to move forward.