John Flannery (left) meets Chairman of the New York Stock Exchange Jeffrey Sprecher and NYSE President Stacey Cunningham at the bourse. Image Credit: AP

Houston: Baker Hughes will emerge from the shadow of parent General Electric Co amid unprecedented turmoil and dislocation in the global oil business.

GE’s plan to unload its 62.5 per cent stake in the oilfield-services company over the next two to three years will leave Baker Hughes in much the same place it was before the industrial conglomerate absorbed it last year: battling the behemoths of oil services — Schlumberger Ltd and Halliburton Co — for customers and contracts.

Since that combination, rising crude prices haven’t translated into improved results in many parts of the globe and Baker Hughes’s stock has been punished, falling 11 per cent in the past 5 1/2 month. The long-term outlook for the petroleum markets that underpin demand for Baker Hughes’s drill bits and refinery valves has been clouded by conflict, political turbulence and economic strife in major oil-producing regions.

Against that backdrop, GE probably will divest its interest in Baker Hughes through a series of share sales rather than a corporate buyout, said Sonny Randhawa, senior analyst at Seaport Global Securities LLC. GE’s stake in Baker Hughes, which invented modern oil drilling at the dawn of the 20th century, was valued at about $23 billion (Dh84.4 billion) on Tuesday.

“The only buyers would be Halliburton or Schlumberger and neither of those would get regulatory approval,” Randhawa said. “I don’t think there’s another entity coming in to buy Baker Hughes.”

Same-day email

Ironically, it was just such antitrust concerns that landed Baker Hughes in the arms of GE in the first place.

In 2016, antitrust objections scuttled Halliburton’s plan to buy Baker Hughes, a break-up that netted the smaller company a $3.5 billion fee. The same day, GE oil and gas chief Lorenzo Simonelli emailed his counterpart at Baker Hughes to discuss a deal.

But shortly after the transaction closed in July, new GE CEO John Flannery was publicly talking about dismantling the company’s far-flung empire to boost profits and rescue cratering shares. “Exit options” was the cryptic phrase he used when discussing Baker Hughes’s fate in November.

Baker Hughes was “non-core” to GE’s main businesses “so it was something they were planning to always divest,” Randhawa said.

Baker Hughes rose 2.1 per cent to $33.13 in New York. GE soared almost 9 per cent for its biggest intraday advance in more than three years.

Unknown is the fate of Simonelli, the 44-year-old chairman of a board with an average age 16 years his senior. He’s been with GE since graduating from Cardiff University in 1994. The company didn’t respond to request for an interview with Simonelli.

Misguided fears

GE’s two- to three-year divestment schedule “provides a defined path for us, and is one we are prepared for,” Baker Hughes said in an email on Tuesday.

The sale could be good for Baker Hughes’s stock price in the near term but a drag as more time passes, analysts at Tudor Pickering Holt & Co said in a note to clients.

“Good news is that investor concerns that GE would find a way to jettison its 62.5% interest in BGHE in one fell swoop over near term were misguided,” the analysts wrote, using the company’s ticker symbol.

Over the long term, however, if GE’s exit deluges the market with millions of shares in a short span, it may overwhelm demand and clip the stock price, the Tudor analysts wrote.

“Investors have feared a swift monetisation,” Citigroup Inc. analysts led by Scott Gruber said in a note to clients. “We view this announcement as a positive” for Baker Hughes.