UAE | Housing & Property

Palm Jumeirah: is it time to pay for beach access?

Buzz around Shoreline Apartments over possible beach access charge

  • By Muby Asger, Staff Reporter, XPRESS
  • Published: 00:00 November 3, 2011
  • XPRESS

Under the spotlight
  • Image Credit: EPA
  • Palm Jumeirah developed by Dubai World. There is talk around Shoreline Apartments over possible beach access charge
Image 1 of 2
12

DUBAI: Hundreds of Palm Jumeirah residents are bracing for a possible beach access fee, even as many expressed unhappiness over the current state of the man-made beach, not far from their backyard, XPRESS has learnt.

Many residents of Shoreline Apartments — two rows of mid-rise buildings on the trunk of the iconic island — are annoyed that the free private beach access once promised so generously to them may soon be taken away.

"I'm very upset," said Anna H., a European who has lived in a rented two-bedroom unit on the designer island for the last two years. "No one here is happy about any additional cost to something promised to us for free. We're already paying a premium for living here."

A two-bedroom apartment on the exclusive development currently rents out for between Dh90,000 and Dh150,000 ($40,540), according to the Rera index, roughly double similar units in Dubai's less classy areas.

Shoreline residents get access cards from the developer Nakheel to use the beach.

Marleen, a Belgian expat, said her landlord had informed her she will soon be charged to use the beach which was free since she first moved in more than a year ago. "I can't be sure what the charges are, or will be, but the rumours I've heard point to around the Dh3,000 a year mark."

Thirty-three-year-old Russian, Ania, who lives with her family in Shoreline, says she has been told that the cost per year will vary.

"My landlord has informed us that when the charges are finalised, they may vary based on the number of bedrooms in the apartment."

Others, however, can only hope that whatever fee they end up paying will be used for the upkeep of the beach and maintaining the health club facilities.

Joe, a South African who lives on Shoreline 6, said: "This is a great place to be. We're on the beach every weekend. To be fair they [developer] had been improving the facilities, with new beach kiosks and lifeguard stations installed. The beach itself needs a bit of cleaning. And the health clubs need to be monitored properly as I've noticed that even outsiders get in and out freely and use the facilities for free."

Disappointed

British expat Jonathan says "not only will we be charged for using a beach, which was one of the main reasons we moved to The Palm in the first place, but apparently we will also have to pay for using the gym and swimming pool. We're informed that the entire amount will soon be revealed to us as a lump sum".

Some who had been informed by their landlords about the fee explained the logic behind the move. Carl, an Indian businessman on the Palm, said: "At the moment, our beach as well as our gym is in bad condition and based on what I've been told, the money will go towards cleaning up the beach and upgrading the gym. Not that it makes any difference to us. What's next? Are we going to be charged for using the elevators? For walking down the corridors? For having a beach view?"

Other residents seem equally disappointed with the probability of having to pay to use the beach and gym facilities.

"If we lived in lower-budget accommodation such as Discovery Garden, the building's pool would still have been free to all tenants to use. Here, we pay more, and live in this high-end development, and now we have to pay to use our own pool and walk on the beach!" says Marleen.

"This is ridiculous. I don't know for sure if or when this will be implemented, but I may have to reconsider my living options at some point if these charges are put upon us," says Ania.

A homeowner, on condition of anonymity, said that the scheme would mean that tenants pay approximately Dh5,000 to access the building's beach clubs, gym, pool and private beach, while non-residents could be charged around Dh12,000 for the same. He added that Nakheel, the developers, may cut down on annual maintenance charge for homeowners in relation to beach club maintenance.

At the time of going to press, a comment from Nakheel Asset Management was not available.

Comments (11)

Comment
  1. Added 13:29 November 3, 2011

    It would be good if Nakheel got their things in order first before negotiating with owners about extra fees. We have lived in building 7 for two years, and half a year in building 6. The showers in the pool area never work (only burning hot water) and the steam bath is always out of order. They introduced a fee in building 7, the reason we moved out -- why would we pay lumpsum utility fee for 12 months when our rental contract expires in six months. All these are not well thought and the service is terrible.

    Hans Meulenbroek, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

  2. Added 11:18 November 3, 2011

    If there will be additional charge we will be moving out from the Palm -- that is for sure. The quality of the beach and its facilities are far from perfect and we are already paying a lot just to live there. It is really ridiculous to pay extra. This needs to be sorted otherwise a lot of residents will move out and the reputation of the famous Palm Jumeirah will go down.

    Anonymous, dubai, Slovakia (Slovak Republic)

  3. Added 10:40 November 3, 2011

    It is logical to apply fees because of rising cost of maintaining the beach and make it comfortable for residents. It is a beautiful beach and residents should be fair to the developer and help shoulder the cost.

    Anonymous, Abu Dabi, United Arab Emirates

  4. Added 09:31 November 3, 2011

    Soon enough, Nakheel will charge us for the air we breath at the Palm!

    Anonymous, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

  5. Added 09:23 November 3, 2011

    I am pleased with XPRESS regularly highlighting issues such as these where consumer rights are being trespassed (similiar to the tellers/cashiers not paying the exact change to customers). I think it is time that we have an active civic body at the Emirate level to undertake the responsibility of protecting the rights of customers. In difficult economic times, where blue chip corporates ease the financial burden to gain customer loyalty and goodwill, it is a shame to read articles where companies strive to generate cash flow by such means. In the long run consumers will move out when their leases expire and this will eventually reduce overall cash flow. Developers need to re-think of their Corporate Social Responsibility or the lack thereof. Clean beaches/pools, lifeguards, gyms and spas are expected to be in prime condition as a promise to consumers by world-class organizations.

    Brian Dominic Tellis, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, United Arab Emirates

  6. Added 09:06 November 3, 2011

    It's a disgrace and looks like I will be moving out, the beach is filthy, the loungers are non existent and another copout by Nakheel....What a joke!

    Anonymous, London, United Kingdom

  7. Added 08:55 November 3, 2011

    Your article misses the point. The pools and gyms are and should be common property of the Shoreline owners. The Owners Associations should choose the management company to run them in a fair and competitive tender process and the owners should pay for them based on the contract they enter into with this third party. The owners are worried tha they will continue to be run from behind closed doors with no cost transparency. The owners would like some accountability and to choose how they are run. This is the main reason owners are upset. The beach is not part of the common property, but this should be paid for and maintained out of the huge “Master Community Fee” the owners pay, which is in addition to the building service fee and the clubhouse fee. Owners were told the pools and gyms would be charged for with a “nominal fee” when they first bought their apartments, I can see why they are upset.

    Anonymous, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

  8. Added 08:50 November 3, 2011

    Soon a day will come where you'll have to pay to walk around the area too.

    Mikhail, Sharjah , United Arab Emirates

  9. Added 08:24 November 3, 2011

    Money making policy, nothing else.

    Anonymous, DUBAI, United Arab Emirates

  10. Added 08:13 November 3, 2011

    Owners were 'promised ' exclusive use of the beach. As I understand it, the pools and gyms are common property. As an owner I expect to pay for the upkeep and maintenance. I expect to be able to pass on the benefit of my ownership and payments to a tenant... I expect Nakheel to fulfill it's obligations and not to break promises. First Rera must approve Owners Associations (perhaps with an officially elected tenant's observer). Then the issues can be discussed. At the moment there is a lack of information and on the face of it Nakheel is trying to charge twice for the beach and sell memberships to a club that is not theirs. Nakheel as a government-linked company must set the standards so the rest of the world can judge whether we have an ethical property market.

    john felton, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

  11. View more comments

Crackdown

Passports seized in Dish TV crackdown

Dubai airport

Swords, knives, fake guns seized in Dubai

India-Pakistan

New visa rules thrill cross-border couples

Community Reports

More from Community Reports

Video

In the lanes of Deira Spice Souq

Gallery

A pick of the best pictures taken by readers