Business | Markets

Internet stock collapse dents Silicon Valley

Dotcom darlings turned pariahs

  • Reuters
  • Published: 13:32 July 28, 2012
  • Gulf News

The Nasdaq MarketSite in New York on the day of Facebook’s market debut
  • Image Credit: Bloomberg
  • The Nasdaq MarketSite in New York on the day of Facebook’s market debut. The stock has gone straight down since its botched IPO and now trades over a third below its $38 IPO price.

San Francisco: Social media companies, once hailed by their Silicon Valley boosters as world-changing businesses with limitless potential, are instead proving a sobering reminder of how investors can be seduced by Internet hype.

With a few exceptions, the first wave of social media firms to trade on the public markets has delivered a disastrous performance that conjures memories of the dot-com bust of 2000.

“Farmville” publisher Zynga, which went public in December at a valuation of $7 billion, is trading around $3.15 a share, more than 68 per cent off its $10 IPO price.

Daily deals site Groupon, touted as the firm that could reinvent local commerce, has fallen from its $20 IPO price to about $7.15 in nearly nine months. Music service Pandora Media has dropped from $16 at its June 2011 IPO to around $10 on Friday.

And on Thursday, the 800-pound gorilla of the group, Facebook Inc, reported tepid results that shaved some $10 billion (Dh3.67 billion) off the company’s market cap. The stock has gone straight down since its botched May initial public offering and now trades over a third below its $38 IPO price.

“The VCs [venture capitalists], the private equity guys at the early stages, already cashed out and made their fortunes,” said Peter Schiff, chief executive of Euro Pacific Capital. “Everybody else who ran to buy the stock at the IPO at a sky-high valuation ended up holding the bag.”

“A lot of these companies are going to make a quick buck and flame out,” he added. “Just look at 10 years ago.”

If an investor had sunk $1,000 into any of the four erstwhile dotcom darlings, he would have anywhere from $317.50 to $706.45 left over. That same wad of cash in LinkedIn would have more than doubled, to about $2,200.

But many VC firms — such as early Facebook backer Accel Partners — made a killing on the IPOs by getting in the door first. Early backers in Pandora, for instance, may have picked up shares in the firm for as little as around 50 cents apiece.

Other early investors held on and got singed. Some of Wall Street’s top names, from Fidelity and T. Rowe Price to Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have watched paper losses pile up to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.

It’s true that a few companies with more of a business focus — notably LinkedIn Corp — have done much better. The jobs-networking site is trading at about $100, well above its $45 IPO price from May 2011. Yelp Inc, the local reviews company, is holding above its $15 IPO price from March.

Startups in areas like data analytics and enterprise software like Splunk Inc have also fared well.

But the wipe-out among consumer-oriented social media companies has raised concerns that the entire sector is fad-driven. While the public companies are profitable and showing strong growth — unlike the class of 1999 and 2000 — it is not clear how sustainable that is.

“People just can’t figure out how these companies are going to make money and justify these huge valuations,” said Michael Yoshikami, founder of Destination Wealth Management.

The euphoria around Internet stocks, Yoshikami added, has faded. “It’s different from six months ago,” he said.

Venture capitalists fear the high-profile stock busts will take a toll on the next wave of companies trying to go public. To some extent, they say, they already have.

“It’s going to have a chilling, sobering effect,” said Tim Chang, managing partner at Mayfield Fund. “It’s especially hard to make the argument of why a company should be valued at $1 billion or more.”

WINNERS AND LOSERS

One sign of Wall Street’s scepticism: about 63 per cent of the shares available for shorting in Facebook are currently getting shorted, well above the market average of about 16 per cent, according to Markit data.

A hedge fund manager who has shorted its shares since the IPO argued it is still too richly valued.

“You may love your favourite candy but if they are going to charge you $1,000 for it, you’re probably not going to buy it,” the manager said. “It’s a great company, clearly. But if you look at the business, you say: well a year ago the revenues grew 107 per cent year-over-year, this most recent quarter it grew 32 per cent. It’s clearly decelerating.”

On Thursday, Facebook reported its first quarterly revenues of $1.18 billion. But executives warned a quickening shift to its underperforming mobile app was eating into results, and user and revenue growth slowed for the fifth consecutive quarter. The stock lost 11.7 per cent in trading on Friday.

It has not helped pacify Wall Street that the tech firms’ venture capital backers on Sand Hill Road in Menlo Park, California, have enjoyed big paydays via IPOs. In the case of Facebook, Accel Partners sold 49 million shares at $38 apiece, reaping enormous profits.

Insiders have sold large chunks of their holdings in Zynga and Groupon, though the top executives still maintain large stakes in their companies. Zynga CEO Mark Pincus and other insiders netted some $500 million when they sold a portion of their stock in April at $12 a share.

Others were less fortunate. T. Rowe Price lost $61.4 million in its Facebook and Zynga holdings over two days. Fidelity, the largest US fund, saw $126 million of its on-paper holdings evaporate over the past two days.

As Facebook has slid, Goldman Sachs’ remaining holdings of 41.6 million shares — according to its latest filings — would have shed $624 million in value. Morgan Stanley, which now holds 11.34 million shares, would have seen its Facebook stock decline by $170.1 million since the public-market debut.

Crosslink Capital and Greylock Partners still hold all their Pandora shares as of the latest filings. That represents a loss of $210 million for Crosslink, which still holds 35 million shares, and $129 million for Greylock with 21.5 million shares. But both started investing years ago: for as little as 51 cents a share in Crosslink’s case, and 77 cents a share in Greylock’s.

Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers has stood firmly behind Zynga, choosing to hold onto 21 million shares though the stake would be worth $143.85 million less today.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who owns just north of half a billion shares, took his lumps as well, as more than $3 billion of his paper-wealth evaporate this week.

Zynga’s stock went into free-fall after it slashed its 2012 outlook from 23 to 29 cents to 4 to 9 cents, blaming weakness in existing Facebook games and a delay in its pipeline.

The results widely missed expectations set by company management at the end of last quarter, when Chief Operating Officer John Schappert said the company was “excited and comfortable raising guidance for the year.”

On a conference call, BTIG analyst Richard Greenfield took Zynga executives to task for not warning investors. Chief Financial Officer Dave Wehner said it was company policy to only give guidance once a quarter.

But the earnings report “doesn’t jive” with executives’ recently upbeat comments, Greenfield later told Reuters. A handful of plaintiffs’ lawyers announced Thursday they had begun investigating Zynga for breach of fiduciary duty.

Meanwhile, Facebook’s executives took a conservative approach on Thursday, MORE

Gulf News
Retail Gold Rate
Business Editor's choice
Quick Access

  1. Markets

  2. Economy

  3. Property

  4. Aviation

Business Top Stories

  1. Samsung, LG unveil new smartwatches

  2. Malaysia Airlines cleared for radical revamp

  3. Qantas bullish on Emirates partnership

  4. Philippine economy grows by 6.4%

  5. Microsoft CEO to visit China amid probe