The Epstein files, the US government’s denial, and a MAGA meltdown
Justice Department shuts down Epstein file rumours, igniting outrage in Trump world
In a memo that instantly set political media and conspiracy circles ablaze, the US Justice Department declared this week that Jeffrey Epstein did not keep a “client list” and that no additional files related to his sex trafficking investigation would be made public.
The statement, unsigned but bearing DOJ and FBI logos, directly contradicts claims made for months by Trump-era Attorney General Pam Bondi, who had suggested that such a list not only existed but was imminent for release.
With that single line, the department effectively slammed the brakes on one of the most persistent conspiracy theories of the post-Epstein era — that a classified list of elite associates who allegedly exploited underage girls was being covered up by the government. It also marked a public reversal of narratives that had been promoted from inside Trump’s White House, with Bondi once telling Fox News the list was “on my desk.”
The fallout has been swift. The far-right online ecosystem, much of it aligned with Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement, erupted in outrage. Prominent figures like Alex Jones and Jack Posobiec accused the administration of betrayal. Elon Musk, now an active political rival to Trump, seized on the moment to escalate his criticism, even declaring the Epstein files a “top priority” for his new political outfit, the America Party.
But what really happened behind the scenes? What do we know — and what remains in the dark? Here’s a breakdown.
What the Justice Department actually said
The July 7 memo issued by the DOJ and FBI states:
There is no Epstein “client list” documenting people who were trafficked underage girls.
No additional documents will be released, despite earlier claims from Bondi and others.
Much of the existing evidence is sealed by court order to protect victims.
Only a fraction of the material would have surfaced if Epstein had gone to trial.
The memo emphasised that speculation and misinformation “serve neither victims nor justice.”
The DOJ also released footage of Epstein’s jail cell to reinforce its conclusion that his 2019 death was a suicide, not a homicide — another assertion long challenged by conspiracy theorists.
Why the announcement sparked outrage on the Right
The memo directly contradicts months of public comments by former Trump Attorney General Pam Bondi, who repeatedly suggested the existence of a damning trove of new material:
Bondi claimed there was a “truckload” of documents from the FBI.
She said she was reviewing “tens of thousands” of recordings involving Epstein and minors.
In February, she distributed binders at the White House labelled “The Epstein Files: Phase 1”, which ultimately contained mostly public information.
When no revelations followed, the MAGA base turned on Bondi — accusing her of deception and political theater.
Elon Musk vs. Trump
The dispute has fractured the Trump-MAGA alliance, giving momentum to Elon Musk’s newly announced America Party. Musk has mocked Trump’s administration for failing to make arrests in the Epstein case and shared memes ridiculing Bondi for walking back her promises. He has declared that releasing the Epstein files is a “top priority” of his new party. Must has also accused Trump of becoming what MAGA once stood against: part of the “Deep State.”
Musk’s feud with Trump has escalated in recent weeks, and the Epstein controversy is becoming a centrepiece of his political messaging.
Is there really no list or evidence?
The DOJ memo refers to:
Over 10,000 photos and videos, some involving possible child sexual abuse.
Material under protective court orders in civil litigation involving Epstein’s estate.
No clear documentation or indictment mentioning a “client list” or blackmail scheme.
Lawyers in Epstein-related civil cases say they can’t confirm the existence or details of such videos due to strict legal restrictions.
What does this mean politically?
The DOJ’s announcement not only undermines a core MAGA talking point, but risks broader electoral consequences. MAGA influencers feel betrayed by Trump’s team, especially Bondi. Trump, when asked about Epstein, appeared visibly irritated, saying: “Are people still talking about this guy?” Musk is using the moment to brand Trump as untrustworthy and push his third-party challenge.
Meanwhile, the GOP establishment is reportedly concerned that Musk’s insurgent messaging could fracture conservative voters heading into 2026.
What happens next?
With no new documents forthcoming and the DOJ officially closing the door, the Epstein saga is at an inflection point:
Conspiracy narratives may deepen, especially in fringe circles.
Musk’s America Party may weaponise the controversy to attract disillusioned voters.
The Trump administration must now contain backlash from within its own base.
But the broader question persists: In an age where mistrust in institutions runs deep, will official denials be enough to change minds?
Sign up for the Daily Briefing
Get the latest news and updates straight to your inbox
