World | USA

US House passes bill to sue Opec over oil prices

The US House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved legislation on Tuesday allowing the Justice Department to sue members of the Oil and Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) for limiting oil supplies and working together to set crude prices, but the White House threatened to veto the measure.

  • Reuters
  • Published: 00:15 May 21, 2008
  • Gulf News

  • The bill would subject Opec oil producers, including Saudi Arabia, Iran and Venezuela, to the same antitrust laws that US companies must follow.
  • Image Credit:

Washington: The US House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved legislation on Tuesday allowing the Justice Department to sue members of the Oil and Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) for limiting oil supplies and working together to set crude prices, but the White House threatened to veto the measure.

The bill would subject Opec oil producers, including Saudi Arabia, Iran and Venezuela, to the same antitrust laws that US companies must follow.

The measure passed in a 324-84 vote, a big enough margin to override a presidential veto.

The legislation also creates a Justice Department task force to aggressively investigate petrol price gouging and energy market manipulation.

"This bill guarantees that oil prices will reflect supply and demand economic rules, instead of wildly speculative and perhaps illegal activities," said Democratic Representative Steve Kagen of Wisconsin, who sponsored the legislation.

The White House opposes the bill, saying that targeting Opec investment in the United States as a source for damage awards "would likely spur retaliatory action against American interests in those countries and lead to a reduction in oil available to US refiners."

The administration said less oil going to refineries would limit available gasoline supplies and raise fuel prices.

The bill also requires the Government Accountability Office to carryout a study on the effects of prior oil company mergers on energy prices.

The Senate would still have to approve the House measure.

  • Rate this article
  • Average reader rating (0 votes) 0 Stars

Related Articles

News Editor's choice