When style wins Nobel over substance

In a surprising move, the Nobel committee has awarded this year's Peace Prize to US President Barack Obama. The committee highlighted his efforts to promote nuclear disarmament and strengthen international bodies in choosing him from a list of 204 other nominees. Morgan Tsvangirai, Zimbabwe's embattled Prime Minister, had been the front runner to pick up the prestigious award. Indeed, having waged a democratic and bloody fight against Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe, he would appear at first glance to be a more worthy recipient.

The decision to award the Peace Prize to Obama after just nine months in office raises the interesting scenario that he was nominated for the award after just two weeks in office — hardly enough time to change the world in a peaceful manner.

In their citation awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to Obama, the committee noted he had "created a new climate in international politics." One could simply argue that any leader who followed George Bush would naturally have created a new climate, simply by replacing the warmonger.

There is no doubting that Obama has said the right words since coming to office. He has stated his intent to rid the world of nuclear weapons, has endorsed meaningful action on climate control, and has made progress in talks with Iran. He has also embarked on wider talks on the Palestinian file, though it remains to be seen what progress, if any, can be realistically made given Israel's rigidity on its colonies.

There is no doubt too that his election has created a new climate, a willingness to talk and a sincere belief that diplomacy, not military might, can achieve lasting results. His oratory is second to none.

In awarding the Nobel Peace Prize — prematurely — to Obama, the members of the Nobel Committee were swayed by his style. His substance remains to be seen.