Mended fences and spent cartridges raise brows

Mended fences and spent cartridges raise brows

Last updated:

With thousands of Rwandan troops fanned out across eastern Congo's green hills, many residents and international observers are questioning what is really behind the operation in the mineral-rich region and how long it is likely to last.

The official explanation, offered by both Rwandan and Congolese diplomats, is straightforward.

After two wars and a decade of mistrust, the two nations finally agreed to deal militarily with a common menace — the Rwandan Hutu militia known as the Democratic Liberation Forces of Rwanda, or FDLR, which reorganised in Congo after the 1994 Rwandan genocide and has been a principal cause of the deadliest documented conflict since the Second World War.

In acting now, Congo and Rwanda have in theory ended a proxy war that had played out for years in eastern Congo.

Rwanda pulled the plug on rebel leader Laurent Nkunda, whom it has arrested.

And Congo abruptly turned on its longtime ally the FDLR, joining the Rwandans in an operation to hunt down the militia.

“Rwanda and Congo have decided to come together as neighbours,'' said Joseph Mutaboba, who was Rwanda's envoy during the talks. “And we have been able to tackle the problems that are ours.''

But some observers see much broader economic and political motives behind Rwanda's military foray — its third in Congo in the past decade — that have more to do with Rwanda's regional ambitions than with the 6,000 or so FDLR militiamen.

“Is the FDLR now suddenly on the verge of becoming more militarily powerful? I don't think we have seen that,'' said Alison Des Forges, a Human Rights Watch researcher and leading expert on Rwanda.

“And if they haven't, then what you have is Rwanda trotting out an old warhorse of an excuse to go in again. The question is, what is the intent?''

The stakes are high for the joint Rwandan-Congolese military offensive against the FDLR, given its potential to trigger more regional instability than it resolves.

Rwanda's two earlier invasions succeeded in disrupting the militia's operations but also helped spawn more than a decade of conflict that at one point drew in as many as eight African nations in a scramble for regional supremacy and a piece of Congo's vast mineral wealth.

Although the two Rwandan invasions were devastating for the Congolese, they were beneficial for Rwanda, which is struggling to rebuild after the violence in 1994 when Hutu extremists killed an estimated 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus.

Several Rwandans became involved in the lucrative mineral trade out of eastern Congo after the genocide, and some observers speculate that the present military operation aims to solidify Rwanda's economic stake in the region.

“It was a period of great economic boom for Rwanda — a lot of people got rich, including military officers,'' Des Forges said, adding that the military operation could help Rwandan President Paul Kagame relieve internal pressures on his government, which allows little room for dissent.

“Presumably, if the troops were back in Congo for a substantial period of time, they could expect to reap certain benefits.

It could also be beneficial for Rwanda to have greater control over economic resources than they've had before.''

On that score, unverifiable rumours abound about secret deals struck between Congo and Rwanda over mineral rights and mineral processing.

At a local level, Congolese villagers who have long suspected Rwanda of wanting to annex a swath of eastern Congo say they are certain that their tiny but militarily powerful neighbour is interested in more than disarming the FDLR.

“Congo is rich,'' said Eric Sorumweh, who said he watched Rwandan troops pass by his village recently. “So they just come to loot the wealth of Congo.''

Those suspicions, along with Rwanda's messy history in Congo, have fuelled criticism of Congolese President Joseph Kabila, who has been lambasted by political opponents for inviting an old enemy back into the country.

Kabila recently pledged that the estimated 7,000 Rwandan troops in Congo would leave by the end of February.

This time, his supporters say, the situation with Rwanda is different.

While conspiracy theories swirl, Kabila's backers — and a number of Western diplomats who support the joint operation against the FDLR — say Congo's deal with Rwanda represents a mature realisation by Kabila and Kagame that their interests are better served by working together officially, rather than through rebel proxies.

“I think the two presidents have understood that official contact can be to their advantage,'' said Julien Paluku Kahongya, governor of North Kivu province in eastern Congo.

According to Kahongya and others, the downsides of the proxy war between Rwanda and Congo were becoming increasingly clear. Kabila was politically threatened by the stunning advance of Nkunda's rebels across eastern Congo last year.

And Rwanda was embarrassed by a UN report in December that found it to be directly or tacitly supporting Nkunda.

As a result, Rwanda's reputation as a darling of the aid world suffered, the Netherlands and Sweden cut off aid, and international pressure mounted for the government to solve its differences with Congo.

The report also found that Congo was collaborating with the FDLR.

At the same time, millions of dollars from the European Union, the World Bank and other donors were predicated upon a detenté between the two sides.

That is supposed to become official when Rwanda and Congo restore full diplomatic relations.

“Rwanda's interest is in a stable region, and you can't have that with multiple armed groups running around in eastern Congo,'' said a Western diplomat in the region who was not authoris)ed to speak publicly.

“Plus there's a whole system of militia taxes and corruption there, and none of that benefits Rwanda.

They see their economic welfare as tied to greater integration in East Africa.'' And so Congo and Rwanda devised a way to cut out the middlemen — launching the joint military operation to disarm the FDLR, neutralise Nkunda's rebels and, in theory, fold an array of other, smaller militias into the Congolese army.

Get Updates on Topics You Choose

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Up Next