London: For three days, nobody saw Marcelo Bielsa. He was in his room at the Conquistador Hotel in Santa Fe, but he had not emerged since arriving, chewed up by the 6-0 home defeat Newell’s Old Boys had suffered against San Lorenzo in the Copa Libertadores earlier that week. His project, his great plan, was falling apart and El Loco was suffering a crisis of faith.
Newell’s had won the Apertura championship in 1990-91, playing brilliant, vibrant football but, exhausted, they had stuttered badly in the Clausura championship and were even worse in the Apertura in 1991-92. In the whole of 1991, they had won just nine of 38 league games. The Clausura had, at least, begun with a 2-0 win over Quilmes, but the humiliation against San Lorenzo had set the doubts loose again.
“I shut myself in my room,” Bielsa said, “turned off the light, closed the curtains and I realised the true meaning of an expression we sometimes use lightly: ‘I want to die.’ I burst into tears. I could not understand what was happening around me. I suffered as a professional and I suffered as a fan.”
After a tearful phone call to his wife, Laura, Bielsa made his decision: he would not abandon his philosophy; he would intensify it. He gathered his players together and explained his vision. “For quite some time I had had some ideas about individuality and its contribution to the joint effort, which I hadn’t put into practice because they involved too many rotations in the field,” he said.
“We came through our failings to refresh the structure and a seemingly unfortunate situation allowed us to relaunch the general idea, through a series of changes of position.” And so the tactical future of the game began to be shaped.
Newell’s drew 0-0 against Union that weekend, but once the revolution got going it was irrepressible. Newell’s lost just once in clinching the Clausura title and won four and drew three of their seven remaining group games in the Libertadores.
They drew San Lorenzo again in the quarter-final, and this time beat them 5-1 on aggregate. They got by America de Cali on penalties in the semi-final, but just as a glorious double loomed, they were beaten on penalties in the final by Sao Paulo. An exhausted Bielsa left for Atlas in Mexico, but his point had been proven and his influence remained.
Gerardo ‘Tata’ Martino was a key player in that Newell’s team (which also included the Southampton manager, Mauricio Pochettino). Operating across the front of midfield, he was the side’s main creator, but he was also the emotional hub.
Martino is not another Bielsa, he is far too pragmatic for that — but he is bielsista.
Martino moved into coaching in 1998 and pursued a nomadic career. When he returned to Newell’s in 2012, it was his ninth club in 14 years, five of which had been spent with the Paraguay national team. He won three Paraguayan titles across two spells at Libertad and led the national side to the final of the Copa America in 2011. He came back holding his nose. “Aesthetics are despised,” he said in an interview.
Given the way his Paraguay side ground their way through games — they scored three and conceded two in five games (plus one batch of extra time) at the 2010 World Cup, while their last-16 tie against Japan was probably the worst game of the tournament — a complaint about aesthetics seemed a little rich. But he took a Newell’s side that had finished 18th and sixth in the previous season’s Apertura and Clausura and shaped them into a purposeful, attractive team. Perhaps they did not score as many goals as some would have liked, but they pressed hard, defended well and passed neatly. And then, like so many bielsista teams, they ran out of steam on the run-in, surrendering the Torneo Inicial to Velez Sarsfield. But they regrouped and came back refreshed for the Torneo final, winning it by three points and answering criticism of their lack of goals return by racking up 40 in 19 games, 12 more than anybody else.
Like Bielsa’s side 21 years earlier, for a time it seemed possible they might do the double of Libertadores and domestic title (something that has never been done since Argentina adopted its present basic league structure in 1985).
They edged by Velez on away goals, beat Boca Juniors on penalties and then led Atletico Mineiro 2-0 after the first leg of the semi-final. As 21 years earlier, though, Newell’s dreams were shattered by a penalty shoot-out defeat in Brazil.
So Martino has a decent, if not spectacular, record. He has never coached in Europe, and many great South American managers have struggled, at least initially, in trying to make the transition.
Past record, though, has rarely been central to Barcelona’s appointments. Far more important is the philosophy.
Martino fits that in as much as he is bielsista. Pep Guardiola, of course, shared a barbecue with Bielsa to pick his brains before taking the Barcelona job, talking late into the night. Guardiola’s thinking on the game had been shaped mostly, he said, by Louis van Gaal, and also by Johan Cruyff.
Cruyff and Van Gaal have their differences, but the ideal of a hard-pressing, possession-based game, with a 4-3-3 that can become 3-4-3 was common to both. Martino, having played under Bielsa and being, like Bielsa (and like Lionel Messi, which may be significant) from Rosario, is an advocate of the South American equivalent of the same school — although he has used a back three extremely infrequently.
Yet Martino is probably less idealistic than Van Gaal, Cruyff or Bielsa. He showed with Paraguay his willingness to adapt his approach and, although Newell’s did finally cut loose in the torneo final, it was only after securing the defence.
There’s no chance of him making Barcelona a negative side, but they are likely to be more cautious than they
perhaps have been of late; certainly it’s hard to imagine a Martino side capitulating quite so meekly as Barca did to Bayern last season — and throwing away a 2-0 first leg lead against Atletico Mineiro is only likely to make him more conservative.
Installing an outsider rather than appointing from within again probably makes sense, if only for the freshness of his view. That view is a bielsista view, and it was shaped to a large degree by Bielsa’s wrestle with self-doubt in the Conquistador 21 years ago.
— Guardian News & Media Ltd.