UK mounted police
Mounted police officers patrol along a deserted Regent Street in London Image Credit: AP

In early April, Maruthalingam Thiyakumar, a 58-year-old employee of the corner shop in my neighbourhood in South London, died from the coronavirus.

While some of my neighbours and I were able to follow Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s injunction to “stay at home” and “save lives,” Thiyakumar continued to provide toilet paper and tea bags to the anxious customers who crowded the tiny shop where he had worked for 20 years.

The government had designated him a “key worker” but failed to give him personal protective equipment. He was exposed to a deadly virus and left to fend for himself.

Ethnic minorities are overexposed on the job as well. Not only do they directly deal with the ill — Indian men are 150 per cent more likely to work in health or social care than their white counterparts — they are heavily represented in “key worker” roles dealing directly with the public, in corner shops, the postal service and waste disposal


Thiyakumar’s fate is tragic — and typical. The pandemic may affect us all, but its effects are not equal. In Britain, which has the highest death toll from the coronavirus after the United States, they are unfolding to reveal a gross inequality.

As in America, ethnic minorities — exposed at work and subject to social neglect — are disproportionately falling victim. And the government is doing little to stop it.

The ethnic divides in the data are stark. In England and Wales, according to a recent report, black people are nearly twice as likely to die of the coronavirus as white people, while Indians, Bangladeshis and Pakistanis are also at a significantly higher risk.

Thirty-three per cent of critically ill coronavirus patients are from ethnic minorities, another study found. Given that ethnic minorities make up only 19.5 per cent of the population and are on average younger than white Britons, the figures are damning.

Lower standard of living

But not necessarily surprising. As we know, underprivileged people are much more likely to contract the virus. And in Britain, people of colour have, on average, a lower standard of living than whites. The pandemic’s disproportionate toll was foreseeable. The government could have predicted, and perhaps prevented, many deaths. It did not.

Take housing. Ethnic minorities are more likely to rent and less likely to live in households where social distancing is possible. Two per cent of white British households live in overcrowded conditions; this figure is 30 per cent for Bangladeshis.

These groups are also more likely to live in economically deprived urban areas. Newham, the borough with the highest death rate in London, and Birmingham, which has one of the highest death rates in the country, have large ethnic minority populations and above average poverty and pollution.

Densely packed into impoverished neighbourhoods, many of Britain’s ethnic minorities are in effect primed to suffer most in this pandemic.

Ethnic minorities are overexposed on the job as well. Not only do they directly deal with the ill — Indian men are 150 per cent more likely to work in health or social care than their white counterparts — they are heavily represented in “key worker” roles dealing directly with the public, in corner shops, the postal service and waste disposal.

What’s more, many work in the parts of the service industry — as hospitality staff, taxi drivers and food workers — that have been worst affected by the lockdown. Black African and black Caribbean men, for example, are 50 per cent more likely than white British men to be in shutdown sectors.

As the government eases restrictions, some, out of economic necessity, may rush back to work, endangering themselves anew. Others won’t even have that opportunity. Inadequately supported by the government’s measures, they will suffer financial distress.

Culture is a factor, too. One reason for overcrowding is a preference for multigenerational families, which puts elderly relatives at risk and intensifies the spread of the virus.

Doctor Meenal Viz holds a banner as she protests outside Downing Street in London, as the country is in lockdown to help curb the spread of the coronavirus Image Credit: AP

Low English proficiency makes it difficult for some to use emergency hotlines. And those with uncertain immigration status may even refuse to go to the hospital, out of the understandable fear of being caught in the government’s cruel system of detention and deportation.

Vulnerable to dangerous cases

It should be no surprise, then, that ethnic minorities are prone to heart disease, hypertension and diabetes — making them all the more vulnerable to developing dangerous cases of Covid-19. More shocking, perhaps, is that patients of colour are less likely to receive attentive care from health professionals.

Before the pandemic, black women were five times more likely to die from complications around pregnancy and childbirth than white women.

During the pandemic, that inequality is present, too: Ethnic minority women who are pregnant, a study found, are four times more likely to be hospitalised with the coronavirus than white women, showing that preventive care at an earlier stage is lacking. So not only are people of colour more likely to become infected and severely ill, they also receive a lower standard of treatment.

Nowhere is this differential approach clearer than within the National Health Service. It is heavily reliant on the skills of ethnic minorities, many of whom are immigrants: 20.7 per cent of NHS workers hail from an ethnic minority.

And they account for a staggering proportion of deaths from Covid-19 in the service — 94 per cent of doctors, 76 per cent of nurses, and more than half of all health care support workers. In a survey of ethnic minority health workers last week, 50 per cent felt that “discriminatory behaviour” lay behind the decision to deploy them to the most at-risk, front-line roles.

Despite the proven vulnerability of people of colour, the government is conducting only a broad review of the situation. But then, it is of a piece with Brexit, the Windrush scandal and the “hostile environment” policy, all of which have targeted immigrants and made foreigners out of British nationals.

Recently the government agreed to scrap an annual surcharge of 400 pounds set to rise to 624 pounds in October — that health care workers from outside most European countries must pay to use the NHS.

The gesture provides some relief. But it has much more to do with averting a revolt within the ranks of the Conservative Party than with addressing the inequalities faced by ethnic minorities.

As if to prove the point, this week the House of Commons voted through an immigration bill that aims to keep out low-wage, supposedly “unskilled” workers. These are the same people whose commitment and diligence have saved countless lives in recent months. The government should be thanking them, not penalising them.

Instead, it has sent out a clear message: The work of ethnic minorities may be essential. But their lives are expendable.

Sonia Faleiro is a journalist and the author of the forthcoming “The Good Girls: An ordinary Killing.”