It’s based on the memoir of Molly Bloom, an Olympic-class skier who recalibrates her life after a near-fatal accident and ends up running the world’s most exclusive poker game before being arrested by the FBI. Sorkin, tall and slightly bookish, with the look of an academic who has just come back from a sabbatical in sunny climes, was aware that the stakes were high. “I was maxed out on stress,” he says. “I live and die with these things. There is maximum pressure when a studio takes a bet on you.” Molly’s Game is more than a film about poker, of course. Much of it focuses on Molly’s relationship with her overbearing, fiercely pushy father (a fine, mercurial performance from Kevin Costner). So it’s a surprise that much of this is Sorkin’s invention. “In the book there is no strain between father and daughter, but the relationship really lit me up when I started talking to Molly.” He adds a little defensively: “I am not a journalist reporting the facts, I’m not just pointing a camera at the book. “I didn’t give Molly any veto power or approval, but I ended up showing her the scenes between her and her father before I showed anyone else.” Isn’t it slightly unethical to essentially reinvent a real person? Sorkin laughs drily. “You have to have a moral compass. It’s one thing to paint your picture, and it is another thing to hurt real people who are innocent bystanders in this whole thing. I wouldn’t have done that.” Sorkin forged a close relationship with Chastain — she later praised him for being the first industry figure to email his support when she gave her backing, early on, to Harvey Weinstein’s alleged victims. “I am proud of Jessica every day,” he says. “All the complaints that actors are loudmouths, that they should stay in their lane when it come to politics, well it is silly and insulting. Most actors don’t speak up because they don’t want to alienate anyone, and cultural politics can be alienating. “Actors want to be loved by the entire audience and I appreciate anyone who recognises there is something more important than that, who speaks up for anyone who doesn’t have a voice.” We are, of course, skirting around the real issue: the culpability of Weinstein and those who claim ignorance of his alleged crimes (Sorkin has stated that he knew nothing). The fact is that this man at the heart of liberal Hollywood knows that he now has to shoulder part of the burden of responsibility, to help reconfigure the industry as one of trust and provide a safe space that is also artistically rigorous. He believes that all he can do is keep writing. “The most powerful delivery system ever invented for an idea is a story. We should keep telling stories. I am looking forward to seeing The Post (Steven Spielberg’s thriller about the Pentagon Papers), for example, which I hope is a celebration of the free press. I hope that Molly’s Game reminds people of simple decency — what it looks and sounds like.” Sorkin’s interest in supporting the underdog is easy to trace. He was born in New York in 1961 to a family of lawyers and cut his teeth in the right-on atmosphere of fringe theatre in the Eighties. His breakthrough play, A Few Good Men (1989), was based on his sister Deborah’s defence (she is also a lawyer) of a group of marines who came close to killing a colleague in a hazing ordered by a superior officer. The play was later turned into a film, starring Tom Cruise. This was a test piece for his larger, more baroque work for television, notably The West Wing, which imagined America under the rule of a president with a genuine belief in the essential goodness of humanity. It all seems a very long way from the US in 2017.  Words tumble out of Sorkin that seem spontaneous but well-crafted at the same time, and so it’s a surprise to learn that he feels constantly in a state of creative paralysis.

Ben Lawrence, The Telegraph Group Ltd, London 2018

Articles from the author

Aaron Sorkin goes off-script