Opinion | Editorials
Piecemeal funding of US troops
The Democrats attempt again to control Bush's urges and surges in Iraq.
Instead of the blank cheque, an installment plan. The vote by the US House of Representatives to fund the military operations in Iraq in installments of just a few months is the latest skirmish in a political feud over control of the war. The House voted by 221 votes to 205 to release $43 billion in emergency war funds, but told President George W. Bush he must show progress in Iraq in July, before collecting another $53 billion in financing.
What this signifies is not just a more assertive Congress but that the end of America's massive military involvement in Iraq is in sight. Whether it comes with a new president after next year's election, or before that with an isolated Bush succumbing to political pressure, is debatable. What is not debatable is the feeling in Washington that operations in Iraq will be scaled down. But until those who reside in Washington's corridors of power realise that military withdrawal must be accompanied by a cohesive political programme then Iraq will continue to implode. There may be debate in Washington about funding but there is hardly a word mentioned about developing an overall strategy to help the country get out of its catastrophic state.
More from Editorials
More from Opinions
Opinion Editor's choice
-
No political roadmap for Afghanistan
By Rahimullah Yusufzai, Special to Gulf News
Weak Karzai government does not want Nato to abandon country even after combat troops pull out
-
US campaign to end Israeli occupation
By As’ad Abdul Rahman, Special to Gulf News
It is bound to evoke painful memories of the sordid history in America of the Ku Klux Klan
-
Egypt revolution is far from finished
By Jack Shenker
The Islamist/secularist divide gets all the attention, but it’s also only one faultline among many


