Opinion | Editorials

New union must encompass all

Union of the Mediterranean countries should not have any hidden agenda.

  • Gulf News
  • Published: 00:08 July 14, 2008
  • Gulf News

The recent preparation for a summit that brought together the European Union (EU) and some Mediterranean countries could prove a success or failure depending on the mechanism with which it would carry out its tasks. But what would define the importance of this entity is its set goals and aspirations.

The Union of the Mediterranean launched yesterday includes in its membership no less than 42 nations. French President Nicolas Sarkozy, the summit's host, stated that the aim was to bring nations together so that they forge peace and not make war and that it would send a "wind of hope" in the region. Undoubtedly, the formulation of any forum that brings various nations closer together is welcomed as it facilitates addressing major issues of disagreement and areas of extreme conflict.

Yet it is also important to note that many previously established organisations have miserably failed simply because their hidden agenda stood in complete contrast to what had been initially announced. Hence, the new union should be beneficial for all those involved and not in the interest of a single party as it would fall apart if it is established as a channel to advance the interests of certain countries.

Gulf News

Opinion Editor's choice
  • Russia, China complicit
    Russia, China complicit in Syria carnage
    By Fawaz Turki, Special to Gulf News

    By their double veto at the UN, they have chosen to back the Al Assad regime that is already wet spaghetti

  • Manmohan Singh and Yousuf Raza Gilani
    Two prime ministers in trouble
    By Kuldip Nayar, Special to Gulf News

    Gilani faces contempt of court charge while Singh encounters moral responsibility in 2G scam case

  • Russia's Prime Minister Vladimir Putin
    Moving towards honest democracy
    By Vladimir Putin, Prime Minister of Russia

    Russia needs to unbundle power and property and separate executive power from system of checks over it

Most people still consider spousal abuse as a private family matter and avoid getting involved.
What do you think?

Speak Your Mind

Is violence within a marriage a private matter?