Opinion | Editorials
Debate on Dubai was a damp squib
Simplistic anti-Dubai motion wasted an opportunity for meaningful discussion
The Doha Debates have been an important forum for a wide variety of important debates on Gulf and Arab issues. Broadcast on the BBC, over the years the programme has tackled some sensitive issues in debates that mix expert opinion and popular involvement.
But this week the organisers betrayed their own high standards by holding their debate on the motion "This House believes Dubai is a bad idea". They chose not to debate Dubai's record, or its achievements, or even its aspirations. They decided to debate Dubai as an entity: should the emirate of Dubai as a whole be considered good or bad. All its people, its leadership, its achievements and its failings, were wrapped up into one simplistic debate asking whether the whole entity was good or bad.
The bias of the organisers was betrayed in their post-debate report, which bizarrely claimed that the debate "was the first time the city-state's financial misfortunes had been publicly discussed in the region". This extravagant claim sought to give their debate more authority than it deserved, and also clearly showed they have not been reading the regular coverage in the UAE media and the rest of the GCC, never mind international media coming into the region with unfettered comment.
More from Editorials
More from Opinions
Opinion Editor's choice
-
Russia ties itself to Al Assad
By Francis Matthew, Editor at Large
Moscow's and Beijing's veto of UN resolution may lead to international action outside the body's supervision
-
Can the Free Syrian Army succeed?
By Joseph A. Kechichian, Special to Gulf News
Rebel forces need brigade-sized defections, heavy weaponry and better coordination to defeat Al Assad's forces
-
It's all about the money
By George S. Hishmeh, Special to Gulf News
Sheer magnitude of campaign donations received by both Republicans and Democrats reveals the influence of wealthy lobbies in Washington




