This time, there has been no signature vote or event, but all it takes is one awkward comment to spoil the show
US presidential campaigns usually are not sunk by major policy mistakes or the attacks of an opponent. They result from self-inflicted, unforced errors.
This was apparent anew when Jeb Bush, the establishment favourite for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, recently tripped over himself as he tried, repeatedly, to answer a simple, predictable and fair question: Knowing what we know now would you have invaded Iraq in 2003?
This is not fatal for Jeb, though he can ill-afford many more such fumbles. He will be hit with other questions on the shortcomings of his brother, former president George W. Bush, such as his botched 2005 effort to overhaul Social Security.
But the incident is a useful reminder of how presidential campaigns are derailed. Consider:
Democrats, too, have made devastating and defining unforced errors:
Sometimes candidacies are undone by larger matters. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was a long shot to win the 2012 Republican nomination. But any slim hope evaporated when it was disclosed he privately accepted $1.6 million to help Freddie Mac, the mortgage giant, and a favourite target of conservatives during the financial crisis.
The most consequential was senator Hillary Clinton’s support for a measure authorizing the Iraq war, probably the most important vote she cast. She defended the decision in her 2008 presidential campaign, though she now says it was a mistake. Yet if she’d voted against the war, there might not have been a Barack Obama candidacy and she would be completing her second term in the White House.
This time, there probably is not any signature vote or event. However, the winnowing process of the huge field — particularly on the Republican side — will be made easier when some of the candidates say or do something small and stupid.
— Washington Post
Sign up for the Daily Briefing
Get the latest news and updates straight to your inbox