In today's issue

Salman Khan’s trial by fire: what’s at stake

A look at the troubled life of one of Bollywood’s biggest stars

  • By David Tusing, Manjusha Radhakrishnan, Manjari Saxena, tabloid!
  • Published: 21:00 June 25, 2013
  • Tabloid

  • Image Credit: AP
  • Salman Khan (centre) is surrounded by police officers outside court in October 2002.

A fatal accident more than 10 years ago has come back to haunt one of Bollywood’s biggest stars. Salman Khan, 47, will be tried for culpable homicide for his alleged involvement in an incident in Mumbai in 2002 which led to the death of one person and injury to three others. If convicted, Khan faces up to 10 years in jail.

The actor was earlier being tried for the lesser offence of causing death by negligence, which carries a maximum punishment of two years in jail.

But a court decision on Monday will come as a blow to the massive star, who, with 25 years in the industry, is a major box-office draw.

But why has it taken so long? And will this case lead to time in prison for the high-profile star, whose colleague, Sanjay Dutt, 53, began a five-year sentence on May 16 for his role in the Mumbai bombings 20 years ago?

tabloid! takes you back to the incident and looks at the troubled life of Khan, often referred to as Bollywood’s bad boy.

What actually happened?

Related Links

In the early hours of September 28, 2002, Khan was allegedly driving home after a party at a nightclub in Mumbai when he rammed into a bakery in the city’s Bandra neighbourhood. One of the workers, who was sleeping on the pavement, was killed and three others were injured in the incident. Witnesses claimed that Khan, who was allegedly drunk, got out of the driver’s seat before speeding away.

He surrendered eight hours later and tests revealed he had 60mg of alcohol in his blood, which is beyond permissible limits for driving.

Khan was booked under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), which carries a punishment of jail time for up to 10 years. The charges included failure to take the injured to the hospital, driving without a licence and driving under the influence of alcohol — punishable under the Motor Vehicles Act — and of consuming liquor without a licence.

Following the charges, Khan challenged the decision before the Mumbai high court, which lowered the charge from to the less serious ‘causing death by rash and negligent act’. The latter charge carries a maximum punishment of two years in jail.

Now, the Mumbai metropolitan magistrate, after examining 17 witnesses, has transferred the case for re-trial by the session court on the charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. This means Khan could face 10 years in prison if found guilty.

Khan’s lawyer has opposed the magistrate’s order, saying it was “erroneous, bad in law and contrary to evidence on record”. The trial will begin on July 19. Khan’s Bollywood film fraternity remained silent on the issue on Tuesday.

Why has it taken so long?

The trial has seen multiple adjournments, excuses and counter-petitions and has now stretched on for more than a decade since it began in August 2004. The process has been slowed partly due to Khan’s counsel requesting the star not make personal appearances in the case.

According to The Daily Mail in 2006, the then additional chief metropolitan magistrate had reprimanded the prosecution for the excessively slow examination of witnesses.

By October 2006, the prosecution had examined only five witnesses. Two were being uncooperative, including Ravindra Patil, Khan’s police bodyguard, who died in 2007. By 2011, only 11 witnesses had been questioned out of the 64.

Patil, who died of tuberculosis, had earlier said that Khan was driving under the influence, despite being warned that it could be dangerous. When Patil became uncooperative, speculation was rife that he may have been pressured into retracting his statement.

The late Patil’s statements will likely come back to haunt Khan in the re-trial.

What’s at stake?

As one of Bollywood’s busiest stars with projects worth millions riding on him, Khan’s upcoming trial could put a dampener on his career and the industry. Mental, directed by his brother Sohail Khan and extensively shot in Dubai, is currently under production. The action film, originally scheduled for release later this year, has been pushed back to January next year.

Kick, another action film, which will see producer Sajid Nadiadwala make his debut as a director, was scheduled to begin filming next month. Khan has also signed up for the sequel to the 2005 hit comedy No Entry called No Entry Mein Entry and a film by Suraj Barjatya, who directed the 1989 hit Maine Pyar Kiya, which turned the actor into an overnight star.

Khan’s last film, Dabangg 2, which was released in December 2012, earned more than $10 million (Dh36.7 million) in its opening week and became the third-highest-grossing Bollywood film of all time. The film was a sequel to Dabangg (2010), which saw Khan play a Robin Hood-style cop.

Other scandals

It’s no secret that Khan and controversy go hand in hand. In 1998, during filming of the blockbuster Hum Saath Saath Hain in the north Indian city of Jodhpur in Rajasthan, Khan and co-stars Saif Ali Khan, Sonali Bendre and Tabu were accused of poaching endangered black bucks. The case, which is now 15 years old, is still ongoing. In May, the trial was suspended as the witnesses failed to appear.

In 2010, just before his hit film Dabangg released, Khan’s comments about the 26/11 terror attacks in Mumbai caused an outcry all over India. His remarks that the Pakistani government was not involved in the attack and that the coverage was hyped because “elite people were targeted” did not go down well. Khan later apologised.

That same year, a fisherman in Mumbai’s suburb Bandra complained to the police that the star and his bodyguards were harassing him and his family.

The fisherman claimed that the star’s bodyguards had forced him to move his boat and fishing nets since they blocked the view from the actor’s home.

Lawrence Falcon was quoted by Mid-Day saying he registered three formal complaints but the police only registered a non-cognisable offence case, which meant that an arrest warrant couldn’t be issued without a court order.

Khan is also notorious for his problems with anger management. Perhaps one of the most tumultous and well-documented relationships in Bollywood is his relationship with actress and former Miss World Aishwarya Rai bachchan. Unlike their romance in the hit Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam, their off-screen relationship wasn’t picture-perfect, marred by public fights and alleged physical abuse.

According to reports, Rai’s parents filed a police complaint in 2000 accusing Khan of stalking their daughter, threatening her and trying to forcefully enter their household. In 2002, the scandal hit an all-time high when Khan stormed the set of Chalte Chalte, which starred Rai, and allegedly pushed her to the ground.

Following the on-set drama, Rai, who married actor Abhishek Bachchan in 2007, was later dumped from the film. The pair finally broke up in 2002.

But Khan didn’t take it lying down. The actor allegedly threatened Rai’s rumoured boyfriend Vivek Oberoi, who promptly called a press conference accusing Khan of being high-handed.

Though the stars have moved on, Rai Bachchan in an interview with Times Of India that same year said: “After we broke up, he would call me and talk rubbish. He also suspected me of having affairs with my co-stars. I was linked with everyone, from Abhishek to Aamir to Shah Rukh. There were times when Salman got physical with me, luckily without leaving any marks. And I would go to work as if nothing had happened.”

The sordid episode didn’t reform Khan. In 2009, it was widely reported he slapped his then-girlfriend Katrina Kaif at a coffee shop in Mumbai.

Comments (12)

  1. Added 17:02 June 26, 2013

    FINE, IF HE IS GUILTY THEN HE HAS TO PAY PRICE FOR THAT, WHAT ABOUT GUJRAT 2002 RIOT IN WHICH MORE THAN 5000 MUSLIMS HAD BEEN KILLED. WHEN CAN JUSTICE BE DONE?

    WASIM, DUBAI, United Arab Emirates

  2. Added 16:57 June 26, 2013

    The comments of the gentleman from San Francisco is simply outrageous. To say booking and trying Salman is not fair is vicious. This hardened Salman fan should have put himself in the shoes of the dead and maimed persons' dependents and close ones before blurting out such remarks.

    Joseph Kainikkara, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

  3. Added 16:26 June 26, 2013

    It took 10 years to decide he should be jailed, punished and so on. This is seriously lame. The accident occurred in 2002 and now the court has opened up their eyes and is still planning whether he is convicted of such an accident. Where was the court when the accident occurred in 2002?

    sumera malik, sharjah, United Arab Emirates

  4. Added 15:27 June 26, 2013

    You don't have to be a bad person to run over & and kill innocent people. Being drunk and irresponsible enough to drive was his choice. What if your relatives were killed by this irresponsible man? Would you not be seeking justice? If he was such a good man, he would have turned himself in. It's a pity so many people look up to such celebrities as their hero's & role models.

    D, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

  5. Added 14:27 June 26, 2013

    This man was stone drunk when he killed 1 man and nearly killed another 3. for 10 years he has been free, what about the 3 who lived probably as crippled and loss of a dear one. Where is the justice this is the typical case of Justice DELAYED is Justice DENIED.

    Rohit, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

  6. Added 13:48 June 26, 2013

    Looks like these journalists have something against the actor, as they have collected all negative evidence, many of which is not proven yet and possibly created/spread by people or groups who have something against the actor for a long time now. In contract to the above reports, majority of his co-workers, audience and people around him like him and found him to be a completely different person than what they read/see in such articles. Surely no one is perfect but I believe he is partially paying the price of being a much liked publicity (which is proven by his box office returns).

    Khurram, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

  7. Added 13:13 June 26, 2013

    Negligence and drink driving should be a punishable as per the law, be it in any country. It's high time high society hoodlums realise that staus and money will not set them free, be it Salman or be it the Aurushi parents. the system is again to blame! Justice delayed is justice denied. Book the culprits when they commit a crime and avoid trend setting of running around without a lease!

    Teej SIngh, Mumbai, India

  8. Added 12:55 June 26, 2013

    I couldn't help but comment after I read the comment posted by an anonymous person from San Francisco..."So many people die in car accidents and nothing happens and everything is fine then why to punish Salman Khan?". That was the most insensitive and hurtful justification I've heard. Everything is not fine and some unfortunate family somewhere is bearing that loss silently. My dear the law is the same for all Indian citizens whether you are "super good" Salman Khan or a drunk bus driver. I am sure you wouldn't feel the same way if it was someone close to you who died that night. Getting drunk and taking a life is intolerable and unjustifiable, no matter who you are.

    Vimal, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

  9. Added 12:45 June 26, 2013

    Indian law is so slow and sick. How can it take so long to punish an offender? Innocent people were killed a long time back, why have they not given justice? Is it that celebrities have the right to play with people's lives and then challenge the court's decision? Why can't Indian law be little quick? How many cases must be pending since ages? It's a shame that justice takes 10 to 20 years or sometimes no justice at all.

    Meena Bhatia, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

  10. Added 11:28 June 26, 2013

    No matter how big a superstar Salman is, he has carelessly killed innocent people. He has to pay for his mistakes. Lucky for him that he's living as a freebird all this time because of the super slow pace at which justice is served in India. Hope justice is served now!

    D, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

  11. View more comments

Covering everything from entertainment and lifestyle

Tabloid