Egyptians went to the polls yesterday in the largest democratic elections in the Arab world. Neighbouring countries, and perhaps the entire world, are expected to watch closely as the results unfold.
As the largest and most important Arab country, Egypt bears the burden of responsibility to make its democracy work for the rest of the region. The nation has always been the litmus test of new experiences and new ideas in the region and what happens in that country can have significant repercussions, with ripples throughout the Arab world. The country may have been the second Arab Spring state, but there is little argument that it was the most important Arab Spring state. Egyptians now have the opportunity to practice through the ballot box the very right they have fought for, struggled and lost compatriots for during the Arab Spring. It is only natural that those who supported the ouster of Hosni Mubarak would head to the polling booths in droves.
In every democratic system, segments of the population have grievances that are often difficult to overcome. These people have a right to boycott elections, but boycotting polls at such a sensitive juncture raises questions as to whether the boycotters truly desire to see stability return to Egypt. Is it not more pertinent for those who hold grievances to put their differences aside and prioritise the higher interests of the nation? Channels to address grievances can always be found in a robust democratic framework and that has to be built by all segments of Egyptian society. Participating in elections is the only move that ensures representation and a legitimate means to achieving one’s political goals. Violence is almost guaranteed to diminish any remaining support for the subversive groups.
Egypt may not have perfected its young democracy yet, but it certainly will in the coming years, with or without the blessing of the boycotters. The boycotters know well that the current authorities have the support of a majority of the populations. Would respecting those sentiments not be the most democratic of gestures?
