All those in the government and the opposition in Bahrain, believe in the urgent necessity of political dialogue to end the current deadlock. But they disagree on what they should talk about. It has been more than a year since the protesters began to challenge the government and demand wider reforms. Last week King Hamad Bin Eisa Al Khalifa agreed that the people need real and tangible reforms. He actually launched a reforms project 12 years ago when he succeeded his late father. Critics argue the king's reforms didn't go as far as expected. Others contend that real reforms must come gradually to ensure social and economic stability.
There were reports that some sort of a dialogue has already started between the government and the opposition, led by Al Wefaq. But details are sketchy.
Nevertheless, it is a good sign that both parties have realised that there is no other way to end the crisis than an inclusive dialogue that must ensure social unity and political integrity.
Bahrain can very well learn from the experiences of regional states which saw, and continue to see, bloody conflicts that have plunged countries into chaos and civil strife. A comprehensive solution will take time. The wait could be frustrating for some, who may want to see immediate changes. But the stability of Bahrain and the unity of its people — currently divided along sectarian lines — is worth the wait. It will take patience and statesmanship to realise the goals and changes the king wisely spoke about last week. The king and his crown prince have always been advocates of dialogue to address the opposition's grievances. King Hamad pledged to address the transgressions of some of the police force and promised legal and financial compensation. It is time the opposition came on board and entered the talks with genuine intentions to end the deadlock and safeguard Bahrain's national interests.
