Pearl Harbor 65 years later

Pearl Harbor 65 years later

Last updated:
3 MIN READ

On December 7 in 1941, the United States naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, was attacked. The bombing killed 2,388 Americans, put much of the Pacific fleet out of commission, and came while the Japanese ambassador in Washington was preparing for a diplomatic appointment at the State Department. Among the losses was the battleship Arizona, which went down with nearly all hands on board. It is still there as a national shrine.

In president Roosevelt's speech to Congress the next day asking for a declaration of war, he called December 7 "a date which will live in infamy". Congress responded promptly with a declaration of war against Japan. It followed up on December 11 with retaliatory declarations of war against Germany and Italy. The Second World War was the last time the US has declared war, though it has fought three major wars (Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan-Iraq) and numerous minor ones. Not many Americans are old enough to remember the events of 65 years ago. So it seems worthwhile to reflect on some of their consequences.

The Pearl Harbor attack unified a country that had been divided over the war in Europe, but it also terrified the country. This was much the same reaction as followed the attacks of 9/11. Just as 9/11 led to unjustified imprisonment of some Muslims living in the United States, so Pearl Harbor produced persecution of Japanese-American citizens. Most of them lived in California; they were rounded up and interned in remote camps in Wyoming and other inland western states. Although the Japanese were not tortured, their treatment was as morally bad as what's happened under Bush's watch in Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and other prisons. Critics of President George W. Bush (including this one) should take note. In 1988, Congress developed pangs of conscience and formally apologised to the interned Japanese. It also provided payments of $20,000 to each surviving internee.

Safe for democracy

Those who say that Bush's campaign for global democracy is overreaching (again, including this writer) should also note that democratisation is a thread that runs through American history. One of President Wilson's goals in the First World War was to make the world safe for democracy. That is not quite the same thing as making it democratic, but it's a big step. Even before Pearl Harbor, in the State of the Union message in January, 1941, Roosevelt proclaimed a goal of ensuring "four essential human freedoms". They were freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from want and freedom from fear. He wanted to see all of these everywhere in the world.

The attack on Pearl Harbor put the US on the road to becoming a world power. It did not end the debate over America's role in the world, but it did end the debate over whether the US has a role - it does. It helped end the Great Depression that had begun in 1929, something that all the New Deal programmes of the 1930s could not do, though they did ameliorate it. In this process, it changed American society. With 14 million men in the armed forces, women entered the labour force in unprecedented numbers. It marked the faint beginnings of the civil rights movement. After black Americans had served honourably in the armed forces, the injustice of forcing them back into a segregated society was intolerable. President Truman used an executive order to integrate the armed forces after the war.

Other steps followed.

The UN was born out of the resolve not to allow a repetition of the Second World War. Perhaps the most awesome consequence of Pearl Harbor was the development of nuclear weapons. Two of these were used to end the war against Japan. Revisionist historians have argued that these should not have been used, that Japan could have been driven to surrender by conventional bombing. True enough, but at what cost? Both Japanese and American casualties would have been far greater, and the war would have been prolonged.

During a visit to Harvard University after he had been president, Harry S Truman was asked what he was most proud of. His answer was that after America crushed its enemies, it embraced them and turned them into allies.

A final irony: Japanese investors now own much of the island their grandfathers once tried to destroy and are tolerated by the country they once tried to conquer.

Pat M. Holt is former chief of staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Sign up for the Daily Briefing

Get the latest news and updates straight to your inbox