Opinions | Editorials
Tighter laws can reduce smoking
The temptation to smoke is greatly cut down when it is prohibited by law.
No ifs or buts, banning smoking in public places pays healthy dividends. A recent survey in Britain, which introduced such a ban a year ago, calculates that more than 400,000 smokers have given up the habit as a result. That is almost half a million people who no longer submit to the daily need for nicotine.
Smoking bans have been introduced or are being considered in the United Arab Emirates with a marked difference in air quality in places such as shopping malls where cigarettes no longer pollute the atmosphere.
Apart from the benefits to the ex-smoker, there are savings from reduced medical care and greater productivity at the workplace. There are still some who deny that smoking carries any health risk but the evidence does seem to point in that direction.
Banning smoking outright would never work, but prohibiting it in certain areas is an important step to helping people break the habit. The temptation to smoke is greatly reduced when it is prohibited by law.
But no law can replace common sense; Inhaling smoke is not the best way to a healthy lifestyle. It does not make sense to light up and that is not a smokescreen.
Share this article
Popular in Opinions

-
Opinions
Speak Your Mind: World hunger
Who is responsible for world hunger? Are there any solution?
Opinion Editor's choice
-
Guantanamo must close soon
It is very disappointing that Obama is saying he will not meet his own deadline
-
Hariri has Clinton to back him up
Lebanese PM can point to US support for inclusion of Hezbollah in Cabinet
-
Change required in Arab society
In a book that will anger some and excite others, a Westerner seeks to stimulate debate about the Middle East


