Opinion | Editorials

The king and Nepal part ways

In many ways Gyanendra was the architect of his own defeat.

  • Gulf News
  • Published: 00:03 June 13, 2008
  • Gulf News

The Nepalese monarchy was abolished two weeks ago, part of a deal between politicians and Maoist rebels to end a decade-long civil war. But its symbolic end occurred with a few steps by Gyanendra when the ex-monarch left his former residence. Those steps marked the changing of a king to a citizen and a country's passage to a republic. Nepal's deposed monarch waved farewell to the royal palace in Kathmandu, and to his role as the country's king, with a grace and dignity that had not always been present during his reign. In many ways Gyanendra was the architect of his own defeat. He seized power from a civilian government in 2005, a move that made him deeply unpopular. What had the potential to be a difficult day instead passed off with a measure of gravitas.

The new republic has many daunting challenges ahead but at least an interfering ex-monarch does not seem to be muddying the political waters. Indeed the people of Nepal may come to acknowledge that the highest service the former king did for his country was the manner in which he left royal residence. On the day the king departed, history in Nepal was made for all the right reasons.

Gulf News

Opinion Editor's choice
  • Russia, China complicit
    Russia, China complicit in Syria carnage
    By Fawaz Turki, Special to Gulf News

    By their double veto at the UN, they have chosen to back the Al Assad regime that is already wet spaghetti

  • Manmohan Singh and Yousuf Raza Gilani
    Two prime ministers in trouble
    By Kuldip Nayar, Special to Gulf News

    Gilani faces contempt of court charge while Singh encounters moral responsibility in 2G scam case

  • Russia's Prime Minister Vladimir Putin
    Moving towards honest democracy
    By Vladimir Putin, Prime Minister of Russia

    Russia needs to unbundle power and property and separate executive power from system of checks over it

Most people still consider spousal abuse as a private family matter and avoid getting involved.
What do you think?

Speak Your Mind

Is violence within a marriage a private matter?