Opinion | Editorials
Mineral rights, not human rights
Myanmar's excesses are tolerated to enable resource exploitation.
When the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) speaks against a government, the matter is serious. The ICRC normally adopts a neutral stance, thereby allowing it to work where other organisations, maybe with their own agenda, are unwelcome.
The last time the ICRC spoke out against a government was when it denounced the ongoing genocide in Rwanda more than a decade ago. This time, the ICRC has set its sights on Myanmar whose military dictatorship it takes to task for human rights abuses which are causing immense suffering to thousands of people.
The ICRC has particularly homed in on the regime using detainees as army porters, and abusing Burmese along the Thai border.
It is not surprising that the Myanmar military should behave in this way; their concept of democracy and human rights is non-existent, yet tolerated by foreign governments that want access to the country's plentiful mineral resources.
More from Editorials
More from Opinions
Opinion Editor's choice
-
Egyptians must reject foreign meddling
By Tariq Ramadan, Special to Gulf News
Presidential election may turn out to be less a new chapter in a democratic future than an old chapter complete with a stage-managed outcome
-
Moderates may gift Egypt to Islamists
By Linda S. Heard, Special to Gulf News
Liberals cannot afford to sit at home or in cafes watching queues lengthen outside polling stations. They must quit complaining and vote with their feet
-
Is Al Maliki serious about democracy and more words?
By Mohammad Akef Jamal, Special to Gulf News
He is pushing towards a military showdown with the Kurds at a time when they are stronger than ever before


