Opinions | Editorials
Mineral rights, not human rights
Myanmar's excesses are tolerated to enable resource exploitation.
When the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) speaks against a government, the matter is serious. The ICRC normally adopts a neutral stance, thereby allowing it to work where other organisations, maybe with their own agenda, are unwelcome.
The last time the ICRC spoke out against a government was when it denounced the ongoing genocide in Rwanda more than a decade ago. This time, the ICRC has set its sights on Myanmar whose military dictatorship it takes to task for human rights abuses which are causing immense suffering to thousands of people.
The ICRC has particularly homed in on the regime using detainees as army porters, and abusing Burmese along the Thai border.
It is not surprising that the Myanmar military should behave in this way; their concept of democracy and human rights is non-existent, yet tolerated by foreign governments that want access to the country's plentiful mineral resources.
Share this article
Popular in Opinions

-
Speak Your Mind
Focus: Halloween
Paranormal holds an insatiable appeal for our imagination, but do you believe in them
Opinion Editor's choice
-
Iraq in search of Plan B
Despite a close alliance with the US, the government in Baghdad has been unable to ensure national security
-
Dubai acts to boost trust in property sector
New judicial committee created to assist tenants who are facing financial difficulties
-
Recycling should be part of our routine
By simply sorting your waste, you are doing your bit to ensure a green future


