Opinion | Editorials

Duch's apology too little, too late

Former Khmer Rouge leader argues that his human rights are being violated.

  • Gulf News
  • Published: 22:46 April 4, 2009
  • Gulf News

A former leader of the notorious Khmer Rouge government is on trial in Phnom Penh, accused of crimes against humanity by a UN-backed court.

On Tuesday, Kang Kek Iew, better known as 'Duch', apologised to the court and accepted responsibility for supervising the extermination of around 15,000 people between 1975 and 1979 at the infamous Tuol Sleng prison then under communist control.

The apology was followed a day later by a request from his lawyer that the prison chief be released from custody as his human rights were being violated.

The lawyer argued that because Duch has been in custody without trial for 10 years, his detention was illegal.

How ironic. The laws of natural justice creak under the strain placed upon them by the extermination of so many helpless victims that passed between the gates under Duch's control.

His apology is too little, too late, and an insult to all those butchered by his party's misguided beliefs. He should not see the light of day again.

Gulf News

Opinion Editor's choice
  • Russia, China complicit
    Russia, China complicit in Syria carnage
    By Fawaz Turki, Special to Gulf News

    By their double veto at the UN, they have chosen to back the Al Assad regime that is already wet spaghetti

  • Manmohan Singh and Yousuf Raza Gilani
    Two prime ministers in trouble
    By Kuldip Nayar, Special to Gulf News

    Gilani faces contempt of court charge while Singh encounters moral responsibility in 2G scam case

  • Russia's Prime Minister Vladimir Putin
    Moving towards honest democracy
    By Vladimir Putin, Prime Minister of Russia

    Russia needs to unbundle power and property and separate executive power from system of checks over it

Most people still consider spousal abuse as a private family matter and avoid getting involved.
What do you think?

Speak Your Mind

Is violence within a marriage a private matter?