Opinions | Columnists

Pressure ratchets up over Darfur

A deadline is raising tensions and stakes in a UN-Sudan showdown.

  • By Howard LaFranchi, The Christian Science Monitor
  • Published: 00:00 September 15, 2006
  • Gulf News

With time running out on the African Union's peacekeeping force in Darfur, the United Nations may find out if the international community has the ability to stop renewed genocide.

A decade after the world looked on as hundreds of thousands of people died in Rwanda and Bosnia, Sudan's region of Darfur is emerging as a test of whether the world can do better this time. Key governments are pressing Sudanese authorities in Khartoum to accept an extension of the African Union force's mandate that runs out at the end of the month. Such a move, international leaders hope, would give time for a more sizable UN force, already approved by the Security Council, to prepare and deploy.

But Khartoum so far shows no signs of giving in to international pressure, instead lambasting foreign intervention as neocolonialism, and commencing an offensive to take on rebel forces in the region.

The showdown, which is likely to run into next week's UN General Assembly opening session in New York, is shaping up as a signature 21st century battle pitting national sovereignty against international authority and an expanding sense of humanity's right to protection.

At a Security Council session focused on the Darfur conflict last Monday, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said the first casualty of a failure to intervene would be the people of Darfur 200,000 of whom have already been killed or allowed to starve to death. "But the government itself will also suffer if it fails in its sacred responsibility to protect its own people," Annan said.

In the unusually forceful speech, he also said, "The humanitarian gains of the last two years [in Darfur] are being rolled back." Emphasising that "my voice alone will not convince the government" in Khartoum to call off its offensive and accept a renewed and fortified international presence, Annan urged all Council members to "rise to the occasion".

The United States has been leaning on the Sudanese government to accept the UN force. Last month, US Assistant Secretary of State Jendayi Frazer was kept waiting for days in Khartoum by President Omar Al Bashir, who claimed he was too busy with other matters. He finally received her, only to rebuff the American plea.

US President George W. Bush has upped the ante, offering to meet with Bashir when both leaders are expected to attend next week's General Assembly debate. But Bashir may not be anxious to meet a leader who two years ago accused his regime of genocide in Darfur, analysts say.

Since then, the international community has accepted the characterisation of the violence in Darfur as genocide. While Bashir may not be open to western pressure, he does appear to pay closer attention to regional leaders, some UN officials say, which is why they say Annan places such strong emphasis on "the neighbourhood" getting involved. Indeed, many leaders are counting on the efforts of Egypt, which was instrumental in gaining Khartoum's acceptance of the African Union force.

Egyptian officials say they believe agreement with Sudan can still be achieved, but they do not favour imposition of an international force.

Yet with the clock ticking, more voices are calling for the UN to send a force even if Khartoum does not accept it. Africa specialists say there is little mystery as to what will happen in Darfur if the African Union force leaves with no international replacement. Aides say Annan believes the world has made progress on humanitarian issues over the past decade, but that Darfur could be its undoing.

  • Rate this article
  • Average reader rating (0 votes) 0 Stars
Speak Your Mind: Cyberbullying
Opinions

Speak Your Mind: Cyberbullying

How can we protect our children from being Cyber bullied?

Opinion Editor's choice