Opinion | Columnists
Middle East feels the Obama effect
The pro-West coalition's narrow win in Lebanon is the first indication that the US president is being heard in the region.
- By Simon Tisdall, Guardian News & Media Ltd
- Published: 23:39 June 12, 2009
Foreign policy experts and commentators have been trying to elucidate an 'Obama doctrine' ever since the new US president took office. Lebanon's surprise election result, in which a pro-Western coalition narrowly triumphed, suggests these analysts have got things the wrong way round. Whatever the theory may be, the Beirut turnabout is the first, circumstantial evidence of a tangible 'Obama effect' in the Middle East. It could be catching.
It would be fanciful to claim that Obama's bridge-building speech to the Muslim world in Cairo on June 4, attractive though it was, crucially influenced Lebanese voters. But the calmer, unconfrontational tone adopted by Washington on Middle East issues since George W. Bush trudged home to Texas appears to have struck a chord in a country that was teetering on the brink of sectarian civil war one year ago.
Pre-election visits by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and US Vice President Joe Biden underscored the importance that Obama attached to the poll. Some resented these interventions as unwarranted interference. But many Lebanese, particularly the significant Christian minority, seem to have approved of Washington's increased engagement; and to have heard its implicit message that a vote for Hezbollah and its allies would be a backwards step.
That refrain was underscored by exaggerated claims that Hezbollah and its Tehran backers, if further empowered, would turn Lebanon into a second Gaza. And if that was not enough, an eve-of-poll demarche by Boutros Sfeir, spiritual leader of the country's Maronite Christians, may have done the trick. He warned the country was in danger. It was clear from whom he believed the danger emanated.
By giving the nod to Sa'ad Hariri and his March 14 bloc of Sunni Muslim, Druze and Christian parties, which won 71 parliamentary seats against 57 for the opposition, Lebanon has provided Obama with his first significant regional policy success. The result is a setback for Iran, which has sought enhanced influence via Hezbollah. And it confirmed Lebanon's 2005 rejection of Syria as the master manipulator of its affairs, confounding suggestions that Damascus was inching back.
The results are also a boost for Western-leaning Arab regimes, such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia, that helped prevent Lebanon falling into the abyss after the assassination of Hariri's father, the former prime minister Rafik Hariri, and the subsequent, disastrous Hezbollah-Israel war of 2006. Saudi Arabia's rapprochement with Syria, and a parallel warming of ties between Syria and the US, will be all the easier to pursue as a result of Sunday's election.
In contrast, the right-wing Israeli government of Benjamin Netanyahu may view the vote with ambivalence. The prospect of the non-ideological Hariri as Lebanon's prime minister, a likely though not yet certain outcome, must be welcome in Tel Aviv. But this dash to moderation robs Israel's favourite contemporary narrative - the inexorable, region-wide advance of an existentially threatening, nuclear armed Iran of some of its power to alarm.
Peace suddenly breaking out is not part of the story as told by Netanyahu, not while the clerics march unchecked. The Palestinians know this only too well.
Visiting London earlier this year, Hariri spoke of "four fateful years" that had followed his father's murder culminating in this month's "historic" election. "We are determined to end the sectarian violence. We want to put the years of turmoil behind us," he said. This could be achieved by continuing the dialogue with Hezbollah and other opposition groups that produced a unity government last year. Noting increased US engagement, he urged the EU to do more.
Hariri will need all the help he can get, for power-sharing is only one of many daunting challenges. His ally, Walid Junblatt, the veteran Druze leader, said last week that Hezbollah should be included in a new unity government but that the veto power it gained in last year's compromise should not be renewed. The Shiite party will fiercely resist any attempt to reduce its influence, just as it continues to resist demands that it disarm.
Massive economic difficulties, the uncertain impact of the international tribunal investigating Rafik Hariri's murder, problems with Palestinian factions and Sunni militants linked to Al Qaida and border disputes with Israel and Syria also await Lebanon's new leaders. None of this will be sorted out quickly, if at all.
But Hariri has a powerful friend. Having got the result he wanted, Obama will help. And who knows? Lebanon may be just the beginning of the 'Obama effect' in the Middle East.
Opinion Editor's choice
-
Russia, China complicit in Syria carnage
By Fawaz Turki, Special to Gulf News
By their double veto at the UN, they have chosen to back the Al Assad regime that is already wet spaghetti
-
Two prime ministers in trouble
By Kuldip Nayar, Special to Gulf News
Gilani faces contempt of court charge while Singh encounters moral responsibility in 2G scam case
-
Moving towards honest democracy
By Vladimir Putin, Prime Minister of Russia
Russia needs to unbundle power and property and separate executive power from system of checks over it
Your turn
