World | Other World Stories
It was a difficult but momentous year for Kenya
Odinga speaks about the legacy of the violence during 2008, why reforms haven't moved faster and the difficulties of sharing power.
- By Edmund Sanders, Los Angeles Times-Washington Post News Service
- Published: 23:47 January 9, 2009
Diani Beach, Kenya: A year ago, opposition leader Raila Odinga hit the streets to protest a flawed presidential election that sparked the deadliest political standoff in Kenya's post-independence history.
Demonstrations led to riots and ethnic clashes that spread across the East African nation, leaving more than 1,000 people dead and 350,000 homeless.
It wasn't the first time Odinga had to fight to be heard. The son of a prominent, though marginalised, political family, Odinga says he's been tear-gassed so many times that he has permanent eye damage.
Odinga doesn't have to run through the streets anymore. Today he is Kenya's prime minister under a power-sharing agreement with his rival, President Mwai Kibaki.
In a recent interview, Odinga spoke about the legacy of the violence during 2008, why reforms haven't moved faster, the difficulties in sharing power and how the election of President-elect Barack Obama will affect US-Kenyan relations.
A year after the post-election violence, would you say Kenya has changed as a nation?
The country has changed fundamentally. There was a pretense that Kenya was a united country. That facade was removed by the crisis when Kenyans showed that it is a divided country, torn along ethnic lines. The crisis has helped Kenyans rediscover themselves. And Kenyans have discovered the power of the people, that if they unite and make some demands, they are able to get what they want.
More than 1,000 people died. Looking back, what do you think they died for?
In the history of any country, a time comes when the people cannot tolerate political dictatorship and they rise up to resist forcibly. Many countries have gone through this. America could not tolerate British colonialism. Kenyans rose against the British too. The deaths are the consequences of the people's revolution. It's unfortunate, but people were not willing to accept election-rigging.
Do you wish you had done more to try to stop the violence?
I don't think it was in our power to stop what happened. Election-rigging was the trigger that set in motion a chain reaction (of grievances) dealing with unresolved disputes and historical injustices that had been simmering for many years. Some people took advantage of the situation to settle disputes.
Also, there was state-sponsored terrorism. The shoot-to-kill orders by the police were responsible for more than 50 percent of the deaths. We could not have prevented those. These protests were spontaneous, not organised. We never planned violence because we were confident we would win.
Since becoming prime minister, what are you most proud of?
I have been able to institute the authority of the office of the prime minister. This is a new institution that is clawing power from the presidency. I'm trying to create a balance and institute discipline within the civil service. This is not an easy task.
Any first-year regrets?
Not being able to extend my authority the way I would have liked because of a lack of capacity, lack of resources, personnel and infrastructure. If I had more resources, I could have done much better.
There is an impression that reforms are taking too long. It's taken nearly a year just to get rid of an election commission that nearly everyone agrees did a poor job. Some have questioned whether you are still committed to reform.
Things are taking so long because we are running a coalition government. We have brought two partners who were bitter rivals together. First, there are fears and suspicions. And you need to appreciate that some of the reforms needed run contrary to the interests of the other coalition partner.
When you want to remove the election commission, you need to know that the commission was put in place by the other partner and, to a certain extent, the things they did were on instructions of the other partner. If this were a one-party government, things would move much faster. It's not that we have forgotten the reform agenda. It's that we've had to compromise to accommodate the coalition partner.
How is your relationship with Kibaki?
It's fairly positive and cordial. We have weekly meetings in which we compare notes and agree on agendas. We agree most of the time. The problem really is with people you call "the president's men," the powers behind the throne. They try to undermine. You find they try to frustrate implementation. There is an office in the civil service that used to be very powerful ... permanent secretary of the office of the president. That was the (de facto) prime minister but headed by a civil servant. He's still there.
Let's talk about impunity. More than 1,000 people were killed, tens of thousands of homes burned, widespread looting. Yet almost no one has been punished. You've called for amnesty for some perpetrators. But shouldn't there be justice?
People who are guilty of serious crimes against humanity need to be punished, irrespective of their positions then and now. The question has always been who should identify and prosecute. Our view is that law-enforcement agencies are compromised. They are implicated.
More from Other World Stories
More from World
News Editor's choice
-
6,000 cups and counting: Addicted to that tea
This cafeteria in Al Mamzar attracts thousands of customers daily, including the rich and not so rich
-
Swimming pool horror: Twins hospitalised
Twins rushed to hospital after collapsing from chlorine inhalation at swimming pool in their villa
-
Play your cards right with credit card interest
UAE Central Bank plans to cap interest rates, but are you paying thirty-five per cent now?
