World | India
Nuclear deal good for both countries, says Rice
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said yesterday that a proposed US-India nuclear energy deal is good for both countries and for global efforts to reduce the spread of atomic technology and greenhouse gas emissions.
Perth, Australia: US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said yesterday that a proposed US-India nuclear energy deal is good for both countries and for global efforts to reduce the spread of atomic technology and greenhouse gas emissions.
In her first public comments on the agreement since India's government won a confidence vote that paves its way forward, Rice said the administration of President George W. Bush would press US lawmakers to approve the agreement in the coming months.
'Landmark' deal
"I think we can make a very good case that this is not just a landmark deal but a positive landmark deal," she told reporters aboard her plane as she flew from an Asian security conference in Singapore to Australia.
"It's certainly our hope that we can get through all the processes and get this done in the Congress, and we are going to work very expeditiously toward that goal," Rice said.
The pact would end more than three decades of nuclear isolation for India by opening its civilian reactors to international inspections in exchange for the nuclear fuel and technology. Previously, India has been denied such outside help because of its refusal to sign the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and its testing of atomic weapons.
But Rice said India has a good record of not spreading its nuclear technology and that safeguards are built into the deal.
News Editor's choice
-
6,000 cups and counting: Addicted to that tea
This cafeteria in Al Mamzar attracts thousands of customers daily, including the rich and not so rich
-
Swimming pool horror: Twins hospitalised
Twins rushed to hospital after collapsing from chlorine inhalation at swimming pool in their villa
-
Play your cards right with credit card interest
UAE Central Bank plans to cap interest rates, but are you paying thirty-five per cent now?

