World | Afghanistan
Afghan troop surge plan to get nod
President-elect Barack Obama intends to sign off on Pentagon plans to send up to 30,000 more US troops to Afghanistan, but the incoming administration does not anticipate that the Iraq-like "surge" of forces will significantly change the direction of a conflict that has steadily deteriorated over the past seven years.
- By Karen DeYoung, Los Angeles Times-Washington Post
- Published: 23:42 January 13, 2009
Washington: President-elect Barack Obama intends to sign off on Pentagon plans to send up to 30,000 more US troops to Afghanistan, but the incoming administration does not anticipate that the Iraq-like "surge" of forces will significantly change the direction of a conflict that has steadily deteriorated over the past seven years.
Instead, Obama's national security team expects that the new deployments, which will nearly double the current US force of 32,000 (alongside an equal number of non-US Nato troops), will help buy enough time for the new administration to reappraise the entire Afghanistan war effort and develop a comprehensive new strategy for what Obama has called the "central front on terror."
Worsening conditions
With conditions on the ground worsening by nearly every yardstick last year - including record levels of extremist attacks and US casualties, and the expansion of the conflict across Pakistan and into India - Obama's campaign pledge to "finish the job" in Afghanistan with more troops, money and diplomacy has encountered the daunting reality of a job that has barely begun.
Since the November election, Obama has been flooded with dire assessments of the war.
A National Intelligence Estimate warned that a reconstituted Al Qaida leadership, dug into the mountains along the Afghan-Pakistani border, continues to plan attacks against the United States and Eur-ope. The Bush White House delivered a major review of Afghanistan last month that echoed that judgment, acknowledged that a modern Afghan democracy - stable and free of extremists - may be both unattainable and unaffordable, and that the United States may have to accept tradeoffs among priorities.
"We have no strategic plan. We never had one," a senior US military commander said of the Bush years. Obama's first order of business, he said, will be to "explain to the American people what the mission is" in Afghanistan. The officer is one of a number of active-duty and retired officers, senior Obama team members and Bush administration officials interviewed for this article, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the presidential transition.
The military is as concerned about the mission of additional troops as it is about the size of the force and is looking for Obama to resolve critical internal debates, including the relative merits of conducting conventional combat vs. targeted guerrilla war.
Share this article
Afghanistan
Japan pledges $5b aid for troubled Afghanistan
Afghanistan commander calls for staying the course
Karzai: Corrupt ones not in new government
Nato strike kills 7 at coalition base
Afghan soldiers killed by NATO airstrike
Two members of Nato's Afghan forces missing
Brown warns Afghanistan to stamp out corruption
UN pulls half its staff out of Afghanistan
More from World
News Editor's choice
-
King Tut's tomb set for project
Observers note strange brown spots marring lavish wall paintings
-
Thieves caught with Dh6m in gold
Twenty-five gold bars were stolen from the luggage of a Malaysian tradesman
-
What to expect at the Dubai Airshow
We preview what types of aircraft to expect at the Dubai Airshow
